Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/49487
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAksnes, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIzquierdo, M. S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRobaina, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVergara, J. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMontero, Den_US
dc.contributor.otherMontero, Daniel-
dc.contributor.otherIzquierdo, Marisol-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T07:56:27Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-24T07:56:27Z-
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.issn0044-8486en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/49487-
dc.description.abstractThe effect of fish meal quality on growth, feed efficiency, protein digestibility and fillet composition was studied in a growth experiment with gilthead seabream. The experiment included a comparison of pelleted feed with extruded feed. The fish were fed three extruded diets which varied in the quality of the fish meal used in the respective feeds: low quality fish meal, good quality fish meal, and a mixture (50%) of the two fish meal qualities. Fish meal quality was judged by protein digestibility as measured with mink as the test animal and by the content of biogenic amines. A fourth experimental group was fed a pelleted feed with the same mixed fish meal blend. The experiment started with 70 g seabream and lasted for 3 months until the fish reached about 160 g. All groups showed good growth and feed efficiency during the experimental period, with daily specific growth rates (SGR) of 0.90–1.00% and feed efficiencies (FE; fish weight gain per feed offered) from 0.58 to 0.66. The fish fed the feed with low quality fish meal showed significantly poorer feed efficiency than the other groups, and there was a significant correlation between feed efficiency obtained in seabream and the protein digestibility as measured with mink. No difference was observed among groups fed the extruded diets, for growth, fillet composition or amount of liver or viscera, although a significant correlation was obtained between SGR and protein digestibility in mink. Fillet lipid content was higher in fish fed the extruded feed, compared with those fed the corresponding pelleted diet. Protein digestibilty in seabream showed no difference among the extruded feeds, while the pelleted feed was significantly lower.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisher0044-8486-
dc.relation.ispartofAquacultureen_US
dc.sourceAquaculture [ISSN 0044-8486], v. 153, p. 251-261en_US
dc.subject251092 Acuicultura marinaen_US
dc.subject.otherGilthead seabreamen_US
dc.subject.otherFeed qualityen_US
dc.subject.otherGrowthen_US
dc.subject.otherFeed efficiencyen_US
dc.subject.otherGross compositionen_US
dc.titleInfluence of fish meal quality and feed pellet on growth, feed efficiency and muscle composition in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata)en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articlees
dc.typeArticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0044-8486(97)00046-X
dc.identifier.scopus0030858913-
dc.identifier.isiA1997XM60000007-
dcterms.isPartOfAquaculture-
dcterms.sourceAquaculture[ISSN 0044-8486],v. 153 (3-4), p. 251-261-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603854342-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7103111891-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603401174-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7102853548-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602525750-
dc.description.lastpage261-
dc.description.firstpage251-
dc.relation.volume153-
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid745803-
dc.contributor.daisngid31444473
dc.contributor.daisngid1047053-
dc.contributor.daisngid12590001
dc.contributor.daisngid725911-
dc.contributor.daisngid1067478-
dc.contributor.daisngid233847-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDO-7108-2015-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDNo ID-
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Aksnes, A
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Izquierdo, MS
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Robaina, L
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Vergara, JM
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Montero, D
dc.date.coverdateJulio 1997
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.jcr0,996
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4297-210X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4857-6693-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5195-5048-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4358-2157-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.fullNameIzquierdo López, María Soledad-
crisitem.author.fullNameRobaina Robaina, Lidia Esther-
crisitem.author.fullNameVergara Martín, José Manuel-
crisitem.author.fullNameMontero Vítores, Daniel-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

50
checked on Oct 13, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

46
checked on Oct 13, 2024

Page view(s)

100
checked on May 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.