Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/49222
Título: | Benchmarking en cirugía torácica. Tercera edición | Otros títulos: | Benchmarking in Thoracic Surgery. Third Edition | Autores/as: | Freixinet Gilart, Jorge Varela Simó, Gonzalo Rodríguez Suárez, Pedro Embún Flor, Raúl Rivas de Andrés, Juan José de la Torre Bravos, Mercedes Molins López-Rodó, Laureano Pac Ferrer, Joaquín Izquierdo Elena, José Miguel Baschwitz, Benno López de Castro, Pedro E. Fibla Alfara, Juan José Hernando Trancho, Florentino Carvajal Carrasco, Ángel Canalís Arrayás, Emili Salvatierra Velázquez, Ángel Canela Cardona, Mercedes Torres Lanzas, Juan Moreno Mata, Nicolás |
Clasificación UNESCO: | 3205 Medicina interna 3213 Cirugía |
Fecha de publicación: | 2016 | Publicación seriada: | Archivos de Bronconeumologia | Resumen: | Introduction: Benchmarking entails continuous comparison of efficacy and quality among products and activities, with the primary objective of achieving excellence. Objective: To analyze the results of benchmarking performed in 2013 on clinical practices undertaken in 2012 in 17 Spanish thoracic surgery units.Methods: Study data were obtained from the basic minimum data set for hospitalization, registered in 2012. Data from hospital discharge reports were submitted by the participating groups, but staff from the corresponding departments did not intervene in data collection. Study cases all involved hospital discharges recorded in the participating sites. Episodes included were respiratory surgery (Major Diagnostic Category 04, Surgery), and those of the thoracic surgery unit. Cases were labelled using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification. The refined diagnosis-related groups classification was used to evaluate differences in severity and complexity of cases.Results: General parameters (number of cases, mean stay, complications, readmissions, mortality, and activity) varied widely among the participating groups. Specific interventions (lobectomy, pneumonectomy, atypical resections, and treatment of pneumothorax) also varied widely.Conclusions: As in previous editions, practices among participating groups varied considerably. Some areas for improvement emerge: admission processes need to be standardized to avoid urgent admissions and to improve pre-operative care; hospital discharges should be streamlined and discharge reports improved by including all procedures and complications. Some units have parameters which deviate excessively from the norm, and these sites need to review their processes in depth. Coding of diagnoses and comorbidities is another area where improvement is needed. (C) 2015 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/49222 | ISSN: | 0300-2896 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.arbres.2015.09.014 | Fuente: | Archivos de Bronconeumologia[ISSN 0300-2896],v. 52(4), p. 204-210 | URL: | http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5409543 |
Colección: | Artículos |
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.