Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/49081
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Villegas, Almudenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchlatter, Javieren_US
dc.contributor.authorOrtuno, Felipeen_US
dc.contributor.authorLahortiga, Franciscaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPla, Jorgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorBenito, Silviaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartinez Gonzalez, Miguel A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T03:51:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-24T03:51:12Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-244Xen_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/49081-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Depression assessment in population studies is usually based on depressive symptoms scales. However, the use of scales could lead to the choice of an arbitrary cut-off point depending on the sample characteristics and on the patient diagnosis. Thus, the use of a medical diagnosis of depression could be a more appropriate approach. Objective: To validate a self-reported physician diagnosis of depression using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I) as Gold Standard and to assess the factors associated to a valid self-reported diagnosis. Methods: The SUN Project is a cohort study based on university graduates followed-up through postal questionnaires. The response to the question included in the questionnaire: Have you ever been diagnosed of depression by a physician? was compared to that obtained through the SCID-I applied by a psychiatrist or a clinical psychologist. The percentages of confirmed depression and non-depression were assessed for the overall sample and according to several characteristics. Logistic regression models were fitted to ascertain the association between different factors and a correct classification regarding depression status. Results: The percentage of confirmed depression was 74.2%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 63.3-85.1. Out of 42 participants who did not report a depression diagnosis in the questionnaire, 34 were free of the disease (%confirmed non-depression = 81.1%; 95% CI = 69.1-92.9). The probability of being a true positive was higher among ex-smokers and non-smokers and among those overweight or obese but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The validity of a self-reported diagnosis of depression in the SUN cohort is adequate. Thus, this question about depression diagnosis could be used in further investigations regarding this disease in this graduate cohort study.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Psychiatryen_US
dc.sourceBMC Psychiatry,v. 8 (43)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject3211 Psiquiatríaen_US
dc.subject.otherSun Cohorten_US
dc.subject.otherSpanish Populationen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysical-Activityen_US
dc.subject.otherMental-Disordersen_US
dc.subject.otherValidationen_US
dc.subject.otherScaleen_US
dc.subject.otherRisken_US
dc.subject.otherConsumptionen_US
dc.subject.otherInventoryen_US
dc.subject.otherDiseaseen_US
dc.titleValidity of a self-reported diagnosis of depression among participants in a cohort study using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I)en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-244X-8-43en_US
dc.identifier.scopus47749103004-
dc.identifier.isi000257522600001-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602876903-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005959904-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003786852-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57194748246-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24475372400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24447736500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004290629-
dc.identifier.issue43-
dc.relation.volume8en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid289030-
dc.contributor.daisngid5814752-
dc.contributor.daisngid832091-
dc.contributor.daisngid2216345-
dc.contributor.daisngid3887581-
dc.contributor.daisngid4244212-
dc.contributor.daisngid17754-
dc.description.numberofpages8en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Sanchez-Villegas, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Schlatter, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Ortuno, F-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Lahortiga, F-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Pla, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Benito, S-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Martinez-Gonzalez, MA-
dc.date.coverdateJunio 2008en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Nutrición-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7733-9238-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameSánchez Villegas,Almudena-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Thumbnail
Adobe PDF (207,17 kB)
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

193
checked on May 12, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

187
checked on Feb 25, 2024

Page view(s)

53
checked on Oct 22, 2022

Download(s)

41
checked on Oct 22, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.