Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/49081
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Villegas, Almudenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchlatter, Javieren_US
dc.contributor.authorOrtuno, Felipeen_US
dc.contributor.authorLahortiga, Franciscaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPla, Jorgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorBenito, Silviaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartinez Gonzalez, Miguel A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T03:51:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-24T03:51:12Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-244Xen_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/49081-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Depression assessment in population studies is usually based on depressive symptoms scales. However, the use of scales could lead to the choice of an arbitrary cut-off point depending on the sample characteristics and on the patient diagnosis. Thus, the use of a medical diagnosis of depression could be a more appropriate approach. Objective: To validate a self-reported physician diagnosis of depression using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I) as Gold Standard and to assess the factors associated to a valid self-reported diagnosis. Methods: The SUN Project is a cohort study based on university graduates followed-up through postal questionnaires. The response to the question included in the questionnaire: Have you ever been diagnosed of depression by a physician? was compared to that obtained through the SCID-I applied by a psychiatrist or a clinical psychologist. The percentages of confirmed depression and non-depression were assessed for the overall sample and according to several characteristics. Logistic regression models were fitted to ascertain the association between different factors and a correct classification regarding depression status. Results: The percentage of confirmed depression was 74.2%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 63.3-85.1. Out of 42 participants who did not report a depression diagnosis in the questionnaire, 34 were free of the disease (%confirmed non-depression = 81.1%; 95% CI = 69.1-92.9). The probability of being a true positive was higher among ex-smokers and non-smokers and among those overweight or obese but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The validity of a self-reported diagnosis of depression in the SUN cohort is adequate. Thus, this question about depression diagnosis could be used in further investigations regarding this disease in this graduate cohort study.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Psychiatryen_US
dc.sourceBMC Psychiatry,v. 8 (43)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject3211 Psiquiatríaen_US
dc.subject.otherSun Cohorten_US
dc.subject.otherSpanish Populationen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysical-Activityen_US
dc.subject.otherMental-Disordersen_US
dc.subject.otherValidationen_US
dc.subject.otherScaleen_US
dc.subject.otherRisken_US
dc.subject.otherConsumptionen_US
dc.subject.otherInventoryen_US
dc.subject.otherDiseaseen_US
dc.titleValidity of a self-reported diagnosis of depression among participants in a cohort study using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I)en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-244X-8-43en_US
dc.identifier.scopus47749103004-
dc.identifier.isi000257522600001-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602876903-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005959904-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003786852-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57194748246-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24475372400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24447736500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004290629-
dc.identifier.issue43-
dc.relation.volume8en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid289030-
dc.contributor.daisngid5814752-
dc.contributor.daisngid832091-
dc.contributor.daisngid2216345-
dc.contributor.daisngid3887581-
dc.contributor.daisngid4244212-
dc.contributor.daisngid17754-
dc.description.numberofpages8en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Sanchez-Villegas, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Schlatter, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Ortuno, F-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Lahortiga, F-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Pla, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Benito, S-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Martinez-Gonzalez, MA-
dc.date.coverdateJunio 2008en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Nutrición-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7733-9238-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameSánchez Villegas,Almudena-
Colección:Artículos
miniatura
Adobe PDF (207,17 kB)
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

197
actualizado el 21-jul-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

189
actualizado el 21-jul-2024

Visitas

53
actualizado el 22-oct-2022

Descargas

41
actualizado el 22-oct-2022

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.