Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/48104
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLlorens, Robertoen_US
dc.contributor.authorBorrego, Adriánen_US
dc.contributor.authorPalomo, Priscilaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCebolla, Ausiàsen_US
dc.contributor.authorNoé, Enriqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorBadiae, Sergi Bermudez I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaños, Rosaen_US
dc.contributor.otherbanos, rosa-
dc.contributor.otherBermudez i Badia, Sergi-
dc.contributor.otherCebolla Marti, Ausias-
dc.contributor.otherLlorens, Roberto-
dc.contributor.otherNoe Sebastian, Enrique-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T18:58:54Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-23T18:58:54Z-
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.issn0028-3932en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/48104-
dc.description.abstractStroke can lead to motor impairments that can affect the body structure and restraint mobility. We hypothesize that brain lesions and their motor sequelae can distort the body schema, a sensorimotor map of body parts and elements in the peripersonal space through which human beings embody the reachable space and ready the body for forthcoming movements. Two main constructs have been identified in the embodiment mechanism: body-ownership, the sense that the body that one inhabits is his/her own, and agency, the sense that one can move and control his/her body. To test this, the present study simultaneously investigated different embodiment subcomponents (body-ownership, localization, and agency) and different neurophysiological measures (galvanic skin response, skin temperature, and surface electromyographic activity), and the interaction between them, in clinically-controlled hemiparetic individuals with stroke and in healthy subjects after the rubber hand illusion. Individuals with stroke reported significantly stronger body-ownership and agency and reduced increase of galvanic skin response, skin temperature, and muscular activity in the stimulated hand. We suggest that differences in embodiment could have been motivated by increased plasticity of the body schema and pathological predominance of the visual input over proprioception. We also suggest that differences in neurophysiological responses could have been promoted by a suppression of the reflex activity of the sympathetic nervous system and by the involvement of the premotor cortex in the reconfiguration of the body schema. These results could evidence a body schema plasticity promoted by the brain lesion and a main role of the premotor cortex in this mechanism.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNeuropsychologiaen_US
dc.sourceNeuropsychologia[ISSN 0028-3932],v. 96, p. 61-69 (Febrero 2017)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject249001 Neurofisiologíaen_US
dc.subject.otherBody schemaen_US
dc.subject.otherBody-ownershipen_US
dc.subject.otherEmbodimenten_US
dc.subject.otherGSR: galvanic skin responseen_US
dc.subject.otherNeurophysiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherRHI: rubber hand illusionen_US
dc.subject.otherStroke;en_US
dc.subject.othersEMG: surface electromyographic activityen_US
dc.titleBody schema plasticity after stroke: Subjective and neurophysiological correlates of the rubber hand illusionen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.007en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85009084231-
dc.identifier.isi000395216900007-
dcterms.isPartOfNeuropsychologia-
dcterms.sourceNeuropsychologia[ISSN 0028-3932],v. 96, p. 61-69-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35181534400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56609969000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57126078000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56398602900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003830165-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506360007-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004230253-
dc.description.lastpage69en_US
dc.description.firstpage61en_US
dc.relation.volume96en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000395216900007-
dc.contributor.daisngid16476412-
dc.contributor.daisngid3666242-
dc.contributor.daisngid5140332-
dc.contributor.daisngid530255-
dc.contributor.daisngid785963-
dc.contributor.daisngid21646261-
dc.contributor.daisngid88045-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDC-6077-2011-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDC-8681-2018-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDE-8410-2012-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDNo ID-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDNo ID-
dc.description.numberofpages9en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateFebrero 2017en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr1,683-
dc.description.jcr2,889-
dc.description.sjrqQ1-
dc.description.jcrqQ1-
dc.description.scieSCIE-
dc.description.ssciSSCI-
dc.description.erihplusERIH PLUS
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Tecnología Médica y Audiovisual-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4452-0414-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameBermúdez I Badía,Sergi-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

42
checked on Sep 22, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

40
checked on Sep 22, 2024

Page view(s)

53
checked on Jun 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.