Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/47976
Título: Differences in traditional and emerging cardiovascular risk factors of subjects discordantly classified by metabolic syndrome definitions of the International Diabetes Federation and the National Cholesterol Education Program
Autores/as: Boronat, M. 
Saavedra Santana, Pedro 
Varillas, V. F.
Wagner, A. M. 
López-Plasencia, Y. 
Alberiche, M. P. 
Novoa Mogollón, Francisco 
Clasificación UNESCO: 32 Ciencias médicas
Palabras clave: Treatment-Panel-Iii
Disease
Population
Prevalence
Heart, et al.
Fecha de publicación: 2009
Publicación seriada: Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 
Resumen: Background and aim: Several, working definitions of metabolic syndrome have been proposed for clinical use. However, individuals can be discordantly classified as having or not having metabolic syndrome depending on the choice of one or another definition. This study compared the cardiovascular risk profile of subjects concordantly and discordantly diagnosed by the criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) and the criteria of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF).Methods and results: Nine hundred and twenty-nine non-diabetic adult subjects belonging to a cross-sectional population-based study in Gran Canaria island (Spain) were assessed. Participants completed a questionnaire and underwent physical examination, fasting blood analyses, and a standardized oral. glucose tolerance test.Two hundred and four subjects (22%) had metabolic syndrome according to both definitions, 31 (3.3%) only by the OF criteria, and 5 (0.5%) only by the NCEP criteria. Participants fulfilling both proposals showed more adverse age and sex-adjusted measures of BMI, waist, HDL chotesterol, triglycerides, post-load glucose, HOMA-IR and plasminogen inhibitor activator-1 (PAI-1) than individuals exclusively satisfying the IDF criteria. Moreover, in contrast to subjects meeting both criteria, those that fulfilled only the IDF criteria had levels of BMI, waist, total and HDL cholesterol, post-load glucose, glycated HbA1c, C-reactive protein, PAI-1 and fibrinogen not significantly different from those observed in subjects without metabolic syndrome.Conclusion: The IDF definition identifies a surplus of individuals whose cardiovascular risk profile, particularly regarding to some non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors, is less adverse than that observed in subjects also diagnosed by the NCEP definition.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/47976
ISSN: 0939-4753
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2008.07.010
Fuente: Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases[ISSN 0939-4753],v. 19, p. 417-422 (Julio 2009)
Colección:Artículos
Vista completa

Citas SCOPUSTM   

11
actualizado el 24-nov-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
actualizado el 24-nov-2024

Visitas

67
actualizado el 06-jul-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.