Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/44620
Título: | Zinc intake, status and indices of cognitive function in adults and children: A systematic review and meta-analysis | Autores/as: | Warthon-Medina, M. Moran, V. H. Stammers, A. L. Dillon, S. Qualter, P. Nissensohn, M. Serra-Majem, L. Lowe, N. M. |
Palabras clave: | Dose-Response Metaanalysis School-Aged Children Micronutrient Supplementation Chinese Children Pregnant-Women, et al. |
Fecha de publicación: | 2015 | Editor/a: | 0954-3007 | Publicación seriada: | European Journal of Clinical Nutrition | Resumen: | In developing countries, deficiencies of micronutrients are thought to have a major impact on child development; however, a consensus on the specific relationship between dietary zinc intake and cognitive function remains elusive. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the relationship between zinc intake, status and indices of cognitive function in children and adults. A systematic literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March 2014. Included studies were those that supplied zinc as supplements or measured dietary zinc intake. A meta-analysis of the extracted data was performed where sufficient data were available. Of all of the potentially relevant papers, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, 12 of which were randomised controlled trials (RCTs; 11 in children and 1 in adults) and 6 were observational studies (2 in children and 4 in adults). Nine of the 18 studies reported a positive association between zinc intake or status with one or more measure of cognitive function. Meta-analysis of data from the adult's studies was not possible because of limited number of studies. A meta-analysis of data from the six RCTs conducted in children revealed that there was no significant overall effect of zinc intake on any indices of cognitive function: intelligence, standard mean difference of < 0.001 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12, 0.13) P = 0.95; executive function, standard mean difference of 0.08 (95% CI, -0.06, 022) P = 0.26; and motor skills standard mean difference of 0.11 (95% CI -0.17, 0.39) P = 0.43. Heterogeneity in the study designs was a major limitation, hence only a small number (n = 6) of studies could be included in the meta-analyses. Meta-analysis failed to show a significant effect of zinc supplementation on cognitive functioning in children though, taken as a whole, there were some small indicators of improvement on aspects of executive function and motor development following supplementation but high-quality RCTs are necessary to investigate this further. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/44620 | ISSN: | 0954-3007 | DOI: | 10.1038/ejcn.2015.60 | Fuente: | European Journal of Clinical Nutrition[ISSN 0954-3007],v. 69, p. 649-661 |
Colección: | Reseña |
Citas SCOPUSTM
68
actualizado el 10-nov-2024
Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
58
actualizado el 10-nov-2024
Visitas
87
actualizado el 24-ago-2024
Google ScholarTM
Verifica
Altmetric
Comparte
Exporta metadatos
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.