Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Zinc intake, status and indices of cognitive function in adults and children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Warthon-Medina, M.
Moran, V. H.
Stammers, A. L.
Dillon, S.
Qualter, P.
Nissensohn, M. 
Serra-Majem, L. 
Lowe, N. M.
Keywords: Dose-Response Metaanalysis
School-Aged Children
Micronutrient Supplementation
Chinese Children
Pregnant-Women, et al
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: 0954-3007
Journal: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 
Abstract: In developing countries, deficiencies of micronutrients are thought to have a major impact on child development; however, a consensus on the specific relationship between dietary zinc intake and cognitive function remains elusive. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the relationship between zinc intake, status and indices of cognitive function in children and adults. A systematic literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March 2014. Included studies were those that supplied zinc as supplements or measured dietary zinc intake. A meta-analysis of the extracted data was performed where sufficient data were available. Of all of the potentially relevant papers, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, 12 of which were randomised controlled trials (RCTs; 11 in children and 1 in adults) and 6 were observational studies (2 in children and 4 in adults). Nine of the 18 studies reported a positive association between zinc intake or status with one or more measure of cognitive function. Meta-analysis of data from the adult's studies was not possible because of limited number of studies. A meta-analysis of data from the six RCTs conducted in children revealed that there was no significant overall effect of zinc intake on any indices of cognitive function: intelligence, standard mean difference of < 0.001 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12, 0.13) P = 0.95; executive function, standard mean difference of 0.08 (95% CI, -0.06, 022) P = 0.26; and motor skills standard mean difference of 0.11 (95% CI -0.17, 0.39) P = 0.43. Heterogeneity in the study designs was a major limitation, hence only a small number (n = 6) of studies could be included in the meta-analyses. Meta-analysis failed to show a significant effect of zinc supplementation on cognitive functioning in children though, taken as a whole, there were some small indicators of improvement on aspects of executive function and motor development following supplementation but high-quality RCTs are necessary to investigate this further.
ISSN: 0954-3007
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.60
Source: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition[ISSN 0954-3007],v. 69, p. 649-661
Appears in Collections:Reseña
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM




Export metadata

Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.