Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/43863
Title: On the mitigating function of modality and evidentiality. Evidence from English and Spanish medical research papers
Authors: Alonso Almeida, Francisco 
UNESCO Clasification: 57 Lingüística
Keywords: mitigation; evidentiality; epistemic modality; commitment; involvement; pragmatics; semantics
Evidentiality
Epistemic modality
Commitment
Involvement, et al
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: 1612-295X
Journal: Intercultural Pragmatics 
Abstract: Scientific writing presents a set of rhetorical strategies to effectively express mitigation of claims. Critical analysis includes epistemic modality and evidentiality within these attenuating devices. In my view, the basis for these inclusions lies in a truth-value interpretation of the data. In the present article, my main objective is to show that, while epistemic modality can indeed convey mitigation of a proposition, evidentiality does not behave in a similar way. My intention is also to demonstrate following Cornillie and Delbecque (2008) that the use of evidentiality is to show the authors' construal of information rather than to imply authorial commitment to or indecision regarding the information presented. To this end, I will produce two different analyzes of the same data when coming to the description of evidentials, one that concerns a pragmatic interpretation. The study is conducted on a corpus of English and Spanish medical research articles from which instances of epistemic and evidential devices with a scope over a proposition are excerpted. The use of a contrastive analysis is twofold: first I want to detect preferences for any of these devices in two different languages, and second I also aim to discover whether these devices report a similar behavior in both cultures.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/43863
ISSN: 1612-295X
DOI: 10.1515/ip-2015-0002
Source: Intercultural Pragmatics[ISSN 1612-295X],v. 12, p. 33-57
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on May 9, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

25
checked on May 9, 2021

Page view(s)

43
checked on May 10, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.