Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/41835
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Santana, Oscaren_US
dc.contributor.authorConde-Hardisson, Franciscoen_US
dc.contributor.authorVega-Moreno, Dauraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T13:48:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T13:48:53Z-
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.issn0026-265Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/41835-
dc.description.abstractDetermining the approximate date that an ink was deposited on a document is an increasingly pressing judicial need. Standardised analytical methods are required for this that allow inks to be dated. Existing methods require a comparison and validation for different kinds of ink. This validation and comparison must be done using real samples of known age and in conditions of controlled storage. This paper will present the main existing dating methods that are being used in forensic laboratories, and they will be applied to six different blue and black inks for the Inoxcrom®, Montblanc® and Sigma® brands for ink samples deposited in a period of 0 to 2 years, stored in controlled conditions and analysed every month. These methods are based on determining solvents and dyes using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and high-pressure liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) respectively. Dating methods can be simple or combined, using either a single parameter or multiple parameters, enabling concentration ratios to be determined irrespective of the amount of the sample. The combined methods that determine both solvents and dyes are the ones that present the most reproducible results over longer periods after the ink has been deposited.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMicrochemical Journalen_US
dc.sourceMicrochemical Journal[ISSN 0026-265X],v. 138, p. 550-561en_US
dc.subject2301 química analíticaen_US
dc.subject.otherChromatographyen_US
dc.subject.otherInken_US
dc.subject.otherDating methodsen_US
dc.subject.otherSolventsen_US
dc.subject.otherDyesen_US
dc.subject.otherAgeingen_US
dc.subject.otherReal samplesen_US
dc.titleComparison of the main dating methods for six ball-point pen inksen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articlees
dc.typeArticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.microc.2018.01.045
dc.identifier.scopus85044653142
dc.identifier.isi000428103000065-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57195408630
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57195406405
dc.contributor.authorscopusid14060992600
dc.description.lastpage561-
dc.description.firstpage550-
dc.relation.volume138-
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid12489313
dc.contributor.daisngid13468388
dc.contributor.daisngid7798429
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Diaz-Santana, O
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Conde-Hardisson, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Vega-Moreno, D
dc.date.coverdateMayo 2018
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,739
dc.description.jcr3,206
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Tecnologías, Gestión y Biogeoquímica Ambiental-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Química-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4993-4694-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Química-
crisitem.author.fullNameVega Moreno, Daura-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
checked on Dec 15, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on Dec 15, 2024

Page view(s)

65
checked on Apr 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.