Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/37129
|Title:||Treatment against coccidiosis in Norwegian lambs and potential risk factors for development of anticoccidial resistance—a questionnaire-based study||Authors:||Odden, Ane
Enemark, Heidi L.
Robertson, Lucy J.
Ruiz Reyes, Antonio
|UNESCO Clasification:||3109 Ciencias veterinarias||Keywords:||Ovine coccidiosis
|Issue Date:||2017||Journal:||Parasitology Research||Abstract:||The objectives of this study were to investigate the use of anticoccidials in Norwegian sheep flocks and identify farms with management procedures likely to select for drug resistance. Data were obtained by a questionnaire sent to all members of the Norwegian Sheep Recording System in October 2015. The data set consisted of 1215 answers, corresponding to 8.5% of Norwegian sheep flocks. Anticoccidials were used in 82.7% of flocks. Main treatment was at turnout (38.6% of treated flocks) or 1 week after turnout (32.4%). Interestingly, clinical signs possibly related to coccidiosis were observed by almost 40% of the farmers after treatment, which might be an indication of drug resistance. Correlations between the apparently reduced anticoccidial efficacy and management conditions, such as the size of the farms, were found. From the farmers' perspective, metaphylactic treatment was used in 88.5% of treated flocks, of which approximately one third had no history of clinical coccidiosis. Even though farmers seem aware of the importance of good drenching routines based on reliable estimates of weights and calibration of drench guns, drench gun used for anticoccidial administration was never calibrated in 12.1% of the flocks. Finally, dose estimation was made by visual appraisal in 27.5% of the flocks, which can lead to incorrect dosing. Based on the present study, it cannot be determined whether the apparent treatment failure was related to management practises, incorrect administration of the drug, other infections or actual anticoccidial drug resistance.||URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10553/37129||ISSN:||0932-0113||DOI:||10.1007/s00436-017-5400-7||Source:||Parasitology Research [ISSN 0932-0113], v. 116 (4), p. 1237-1245|
|Appears in Collections:||Artículos|
checked on Apr 11, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on May 23, 2020
checked on May 23, 2020
Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.