Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/36058
Title: Nanofiltration/Reverse osmosis as pretreatment technique for water reuse: ultrafiltration versus tertiary membrane reactor
Authors: Díaz, Oliver
González, Enrique 
Vera, Luisa
Porlán, Laura
Rodríguez-Sevilla, Juan
Afonso-Olivares, Cristina 
Sosa-Ferrera, Zoraida 
Santana-Rodríguez, José Juan 
UNESCO Clasification: 330811 Control de la contaminación del agua
Keywords: Membrane fouling
Pharmaceutical active compounds
Secondary clarifiers
Wastewater reuse
Issue Date: 2017
Journal: Clean - Soil, Air, Water 
Abstract: The potential for nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) in secondary effluent reclamation is noteworthy, but both processes require extensive pre‐treatment to prevent membrane fouling and promote system longevity. In this study, performance of direct ultrafiltration (UF) and tertiary membrane bioreactors (tMBRs) as feed pre‐treatments were assessed on a pilot scale. Both technologies achieved high organic matter removal (87 and 93% for UF and tMBR, respectively). Differences in efficiencies were related to suspended biomass in the tMBR, which enhanced degradation of the dissolved organic substances (<5 mg/L) and also stabilized process performance by minimizing residual fouling. Whichever pre‐treatment was applied, RO reached higher rejection coefficients and low fouling levels. Nevertheless, lower normalized flux (12%) was achieved when the UF effluent was fed due to high concentration of organic substances. Membrane autopsies by scanning electron microscopy with dispersive X‐ray and Fourier transform IR spectroscopy revealed that organic fouling appears to be predominant on both NF/RO membranes. The main organic foulants identified were polysaccharides and proteins. Inorganic foulants mainly consisted of calcium, phosphorus, and iron. Complete removal of pharmaceutical active compounds was observed for RO, while NF presented moderate retention coefficients (94, 85, 70, and 27% for atenolol, paraxanthine, caffeine and clofibric acid, respectively).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/36058
ISSN: 1863-0650
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201600014
Source: Clean - Soil, Air, Water[ISSN 1863-0650],v. 45 (1600014)
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Jul 5, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Jun 8, 2020

Page view(s)

8
checked on Jul 4, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.