Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Renewable electricity support systems: Are feed-in systems taking the lead?
Authors: Schallenberg-Rodriguez, Julieta 
UNESCO Clasification: 3306 Ingeniería y tecnología eléctricas
3322 Tecnología energética
Keywords: Renewable electricity support system
Quota system
Green Certificates
Issue Date: 2017
Journal: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 
Abstract: Support systems for renewable-energy-sourced electricity (RES-E) can be classified into price- and quantity based systems. Their most representative instruments are feed-in systems (price-based) and quota systems, e.g. green certificates or a Renewable Portfolio Standard (quantity-based). The origins of these support systems are quite different and are motivated by different political and economic needs. Likewise their geographical distribution and effectiveness also differ. Worldwide feed-in systems are the most widespread RES-E support system. In recent years, some classical quota countries have partially (or even totally) changed to feed-in systems. Feed-in systems seem to encourage higher RES-E deployment, technology diversity and investor security. Although the manufacturing capacity for certain RES-E technologies has been more developed in some feed-in countries, lately this has changed to some extent due to the incorporation of emerging countries in the RES-E industry. Traditionally, quota systems appeared to be more compatible with liberalisation of the electricity market. However, since the introduction of the premium system, this argument can be countered, since feed-in premiums can be considered compatible with the electricity market as quota systems. Regarding the price paid for RES-E in quota-countries, higher green certificate prices have not led to higher RES-E quantities. Moreover, the relative support levels in quota-countries are higher on average than in FIT-countries, contradicting the common argument that quota systems are more cost effective. Additionally, feed-in systems, especially if stepped tariffs are designed, encourage higher RES-E geographical dispersion; avoiding the concentration of RES-E facilities in just a few locations, which can lead to NIMBY -Not In My Back Yard- syndrome. All these factors may explain the steady spread of feed-in systems worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to assess the performance of quota and feed-in systems, thereby contributing to the worldwide debate on the suitability of the different RES-E support systems.
ISSN: 1364-0321
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.105
Source: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews[ISSN 1364-0321],v. 76, p. 1422-1439
Appears in Collections:Reseña
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM




Export metadata

Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.