Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/2833
Title: | Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms | Authors: | Lehette, Pascal Hernández-León, Santiago |
UNESCO Clasification: | 240119 Zoología marina | Keywords: | Muestras de laboratorio Métodos ópticos Regiones antárticas Zooplancton marino |
Issue Date: | 2009 | Journal: | Limnology and Oceanography: Methods | Abstract: | The measurement of mesozooplankton biomass in the ocean requires the use of analytical procedures that\ndestroy the samples. Alternatively, the development of methods to estimate biomass from optical systems and\nappropriate conversion factors could be a compromise between the accuracy of analytical methods and the need\nto preserve the samples for further taxonomic studies. The conversion of the body area recorded by an optical\ncounter or a camera, by converting the digitized area of an organism into individual biomass, was suggested as\na suitable method to estimate total biomass. In this study, crustacean mesozooplankton from subtropical waters\nwere analyzed, and individual dry weight and body area were compared. The obtained relationships agreed with\nother measurements of biomass obtained from a previous study in Antarctic waters. Gelatinous mesozooplankton\nfrom subtropical and Antarctic waters were also sampled and processed for body area and biomass. As\nexpected, differences between crustacean and gelatinous plankton were highly significant. Transparent gelatinous\norganisms have a lower dry weight per unit area. Therefore, to estimate biomass from digitized images,\npattern recognition discerning, at least, between crustaceans and gelatinous forms is required. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/2833 | ISSN: | 1541-5856 | Source: | Limnology and Oceanography: Methods [ISSN 1541-5856], v. 7, p. 304-308 |
Appears in Collections: | Artículos |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
59
checked on Dec 1, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
56
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Page view(s)
79
checked on May 4, 2024
Download(s)
187
checked on May 4, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Share
Export metadata
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License