Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/149491
Title: Significant insights provided by patients with indwelling catheter
Authors: Luque Gonzalez, M.
Martin-Arriscado, C.
Rodriguez Matias, M. J.
Castellano Santana, Pedro Raúl 
Modol Vidal, M.
Armas Moreno, C.
Serrano Munoz, M.
Endrenyi, S.
Valera Rodriguez, C.
Bezos Daleske, C.
UNESCO Clasification: 32 Ciencias médicas
321316 Urología
Issue Date: 2025
Journal: European Urology 
Abstract: Introduction & Objectives: Indwelling catheterisation has been routine for decades, yet it can significantly impact patients' Quality of Life(QoL). Few QoL questionnaires address catheterised patients' well-being from the perspective of the devices and accessories themselves. Invalidating a new questionnaire based on patient insights on product usability and lifestyle changes, we assessed its clarity, relevance, andadaptability for reliable patient evaluations. This study highlights patient insights gathered during the face validation process. Materials & Methods: The questionnaire consists of 30 items divided into four sections: general data, impact on lifestyle, catheterfunctionality, and self-perception. Validation was conducted by the Institute of Patient Experience through a workshop with healthcareprofessionals and patients from the urology departments of the 12 de Octubre and La Paz hospitals in Madrid. Inclusion criteria focused onpatients requiring indwelling catheters, excluding hospitalized patients, those with cognitive impairments, and minors. The healthcareprofessional group included experienced urology nurses and urologists. Results: Eight patients and five healthcare professionals participated in the workshop, providing valuable feedback on the impact ofcatheterisation on QoL. Patients emphasized various aspects affected by catheterisation, including adjustments to clothing for comfort anddiscretion, limitations on daily and social activities, household tasks, and the need for adequate water intake. Patients noted restrictions inlifting, exercising, and socializing, with travel experiences differing based on lifestyle and catheter type. Access to clean restrooms andhealthcare was seen as essential, while hygiene and personal care routines became more complex and time-consuming. Family support washighlighted as critical, especially in the initial months following catheter placement. The early period after catheter placement is critical, with ahigh likelihood of complications requiring medical attention. Patients also reported difficulty following healthcare instructions and expressed aneed for more information about alternative accessories. Urinary leaks were a constant concern, both day and night, along with pain, traction,sensations of cystitis, and discomfort from sudden movements. Conclusions: Patient insights are invaluable during QoL questionnaire validation. In our case, feedback underscores the critical importanceof the initial days post-catheterisation and highlights the considerable impact on daily life. Providing effective support and resources isessential. Using specific questionnaires can help when choosing the best device for each patient, tailored to their unique needs, abilities, andlifestyle. Individualized assessment may further help reduce the long-term impacts of catheterisation, promoting an active lifestyle andadequate hydration.
URI: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/149491
ISSN: 0302-2838
Source: European Urology [ISSN 0302-2838],v. 87 sup. 1, Abstract PA5, (Marzo 2025)
Appears in Collections:Actas de congresos
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.