Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/145660
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBáez Suárez, Aníbalen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartín Castillo, Estela Maríaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Andújar, Josué Bernardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorQuintana Montesdeoca, María Del Pinoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLoro Ferrer, Juan Franciscoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-25T14:30:36Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-25T14:30:36Z-
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.issn2096-6954en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/145660-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To analyze factors influencing satisfaction in pregnant women during labor as patients and the relationship of the level of satisfaction with pain management through transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Methods: A randomized and double-blind controlled trial was conducted. All participants completed the satisfaction scale immediately after childbirth. A total of 63 participants were randomly assigned to one TENS device to relieve the pain, with a different dose in each group. Patients’ responses were measured with 2 scales; the satisfaction level was measured with the Care in Obstetrics: Measure for Testing Satisfaction scale, and pain was measured with the visual analogue scale. Results: A total of 63 women were randomized into three groups: Active TENS (n = 21), Placebo TENS (n = 21), and Control (n = 21). Baseline characteristics, including maternal age (mean 27.3 ± 4.1 years), parity, body mass index, and gestational age, showed no significant differences among the groups (P > 0.05). The active TENS group showed significantly greater pain relief, with a mean visual analogue scale score reduction of 3.3 ± 1.2 compared to 1.1 ± 0.9 in the placebo group and 0.8 ± 0.7 in the Control group (P < 0.001). Maternal satisfaction scores were also highest in the Active TENS group (median 8.0, IQR: 7.0–9.0) compared to Placebo (6.0, IQR: 5.0–7.0) and Control (5.0, IQR: 4.0–6.0) groups (P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression indicated that only the type of TENS used was significantly associated with maternal satisfaction (β = 0.42, P = 0.007). Other variables, including parity, BMI, perceived support, and baseline pain severity, were not statistically significant predictors (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Overall, a high level of satisfaction with care during the labor process was obtained; we recommend the use of TENS for pain relief to improve general satisfaction.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMaternal-Fetal Medicineen_US
dc.sourceMaternal-Fetal Medicine[ISSN 2096-6954], (Agosto 2025)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject320110 Pediatríaen_US
dc.subject.otherLabor Painen_US
dc.subject.otherPatient Satisfactionen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysical Therapy Modalitiesen_US
dc.subject.otherRandomized Controlled Trialen_US
dc.subject.otherTranscutaneous Nerve Stimulationen_US
dc.titlePatient-Reported Levels of Satisfaction in Pain Management With Non-pharmacological Measures During Pregnancy: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trialen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/FM9.0000000000000305en_US
dc.identifier.scopus105012987495-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57192653079-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55969435900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57204794199-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57053477400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid8256199100-
dc.identifier.eissn2641-5895-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages9en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateAgosto 2025en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,335
dc.description.sjrqQ3
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Patología y Tecnología médica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Morfología-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Enfermería-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medio Ambiente y Salud-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Matemáticas-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Bioquímica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Clínicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6264-6312-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1276-7594-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0517-8209-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameBáez Suárez, Aníbal-
crisitem.author.fullNameMartín Castillo, Estela María-
crisitem.author.fullNameGarcía Andújar, Josué Bernardo-
crisitem.author.fullNameQuintana Montesdeoca, María Del Pino-
crisitem.author.fullNameLoro Ferrer, Juan Francisco-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (683,85 kB)
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.