Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/141746
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMacías Verde, David Armando-
dc.contributor.authorBurgos-Burgos, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorLara, Pedro C.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-30T08:45:55Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-30T08:45:55Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694-
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/141746-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients bearing large-volume, bulky primary or relapsed tumors, are usually referred to palliative low-dose radiotherapy with very poor results. Lattice Radiation Therapy (LRT) is able to produce a high number of high-dose foci or vortexes (multiple SBRT treatments), separated by low-dose zones (valleys). Treatment planning on vortex placing, valley definition, and dose administered depends on individual decisions of the treating team. The aim of our study is to assess for the first time the possibility of a dense fractionated LRT within the target volume. Methods: A total of 22 treatments in 20 patients were performed in the frame of a prospective observational study of fractionated LRT ongoing in our institution. According to our aim of achieving dense LRT, no GTV contraction was considered to create the LRTV (GTV is equal to LRTV). The vortexes were segmented as 1 cm diameter at a 1.5 cm vortex-to-vortex distance. Dose prescription to the vortexes per fraction was 12 Gy. Results: The vortex/LRTV ratio was 7.38 +/- 2.13% (3.4-10.40%, median 7.60%). Mean dose to the vortex volume was 11.90 +/- 0.09 Gy (11.70-12.10 Gy, median 11.90 Gy). Mean dose administered to the valley volume was 8.29 +/- 0.70 (7.05-9.51 Gy, median 8.29 Gy). Valley/vortex (peak) dose ratio (VPDR) was 69.40 +/- 6.02% (59.00-79.80%, median 69.70%). The mean peripheral tumor dose was 5.11 +/- 0.8710 Gy (3.16-6.78 Gy, median 5.18 Gy). Conclusions: Our dense LRT schedule fulfilled most of the recommended guidelines for LRT, increasing the high dose points without risking the dose to the surrounding tissues. Further analysis of feasibility and safety are needed to secure the clinical relevance of our proposed protocol.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCancers (Basel)-
dc.sourceCancers, [ISSN 2072-6694] v. 17 (12), (Junio 2025)-
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicas-
dc.subject320101 Oncología-
dc.subject320111 Radiología-
dc.subject.otherPhase-I Trial-
dc.subject.otherLite Sabr M1-
dc.subject.otherRadiotherapy-
dc.subject.otherLattice Radiation Radiotherapy-
dc.subject.otherLrt-
dc.subject.otherSfrt-
dc.subject.otherFractionated-
dc.subject.otherDense-
dc.titleAutomated Clinical Dosimetry Planning of Dense Lattice Radiation Therapy-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Article-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers17122048-
dc.identifier.scopus105009052715-
dc.identifier.isi001514701000001-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5853-3649-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1709-6232-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57210739641-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57214721458-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004374085-
dc.identifier.eissn2072-6694-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.relation.volume17-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Salud-
dc.type2Artículo-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.description.numberofpages12-
dc.utils.revision-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Macias-Verde, D-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Burgos-Burgos, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Lara, PC-
dc.date.coverdateJunio 2025-
dc.identifier.ulpgc-
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MED-
dc.description.sjr1,391-
dc.description.jcr4,5-
dc.description.sjrqQ1-
dc.description.jcrqQ1-
dc.description.miaricds10,6-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.fullNameMacías Verde, David Armando-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.