Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/140127
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Monzón, Antonio J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Sánchez, Carlosen_US
dc.contributor.authorÁlamo, Guillermo M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPadrón, Luis A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-13T12:34:38Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-13T12:34:38Z-
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/140127-
dc.description.abstractThis paper tests the capability of a simplified model to predict major trends in the dynamic structural response of monopile offshore wind turbines. For this purpose, the results of two numerical models of different levels of complexity are compared: the advanced time-domain multi-physics tool OpenFAST and a simplified static-equivalent model based on beam elements and concentrated masses. The IEA-15-240-RWT reference wind turbine is considered as a benchmarking problem. The comparison between the two structural models is presented in terms of their fundamental frequencies and through the analysis of shear forces and bending moments under wind-only and combined wave and wind load scenarios. The results show that the simplified model can adequately represent the system’s mass and stiffness characteristics, as well as the impact of soil–structure interaction effects on its fundamental frequency. Turbulence and wind velocity have a significant impact on internal forces and on the ability of the simplified model to reproduce their values. Despite the large differences obtained for highly turbulent scenarios, the acceptable accuracy obtained for relevant load scenarios and the conservative nature of the simplified model make it a viable option for preliminary large-scale studies that prioritize efficiency and efficacy over high-precision.en_US
dc.languagespaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences (Switzerland)en_US
dc.sourceApplied Sciences (Switzerland)[EISSN 2076-3417],v. 15 (3), (Febrero 2025)en_US
dc.subject.otherMonopile Foundationen_US
dc.subject.otherOffshore Wind Turbineen_US
dc.subject.otherOpenfasten_US
dc.subject.otherSoil–Structure Interactionen_US
dc.subject.otherStatic-Equivalent Analysisen_US
dc.titleCan a Simple Static-Equivalent Model Be Used to Predict Major Trends in the Dynamic Structural Response of Monopile Offshore Wind Turbines?en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app15031633en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85217790657-
dc.contributor.orcid0009-0009-5918-7889-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8610-3793-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5975-7145-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5693-051X-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid59557252300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58683070800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56790034300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid16301716000-
dc.identifier.eissn2076-3417-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.relation.volume15en_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateFebrero 2025en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-INGen_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.