Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/136522
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Suárez, Claudio Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorMariscal-Crespo, María-Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorHernández-De Luis, María-Naira-
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira-da-Costa, Emília-Isabel Martins-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález De La Torre, Héctor-
dc.contributor.authorCamacho-Bejarano, Rafaela-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-05T17:32:37Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-05T17:32:37Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.issn2039-4403-
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/136522-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: The NANDA International, Inc., (NANDA-I) diagnostic classification is the most widely used standardized nursing language internationally. The EVALUAN-I tool was developed to evaluate the NANDA-I diagnostic classification. The aim was to analyze the use of the NANDA-I diagnostic classification among Spanish nurses and assess its correlation with sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a non-probabilistic sample of Spanish nurses working in clinical, management, and academic settings using the EVALUAN-I tool (September 2019–December 2020). The analysis was conducted using R® (version 3.6.3, Lavaan package; R Core Team, 2020), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (2019-190-1). Results: A total of 483 responses were obtained. There was a correlation between the intensity of use of NANDA-I and its application in practice (polychoric correlation = 0.50; p < 0.001). Nurses with a PhD degree considered nursing diagnoses to be less evidence-based (p = 0.037) but more useful (p = 0.035). Academic and research nurses stated that NANDA-I was more useful (p = 0.007), even for exclusive responsibilities (p = 0.034), and that it provided greater significance to diagnoses (p = 0.0012). Conclusions: NANDA-I is the most widely used standardized nursing language in Spain. Nurses’ academic qualifications and work environment significantly influence their perceptions and use of NANDA-I. Advanced education fosters a critical yet positive perspective, highlighting a relationship between the intensity of its use, its application in clinical practice, and the nurse’s educational background. Tools such as EVALUAN-I promote its integration and evidence-based practice, but challenges remain in improving perceptions, scientific evidence, and visibility in electronic health records to enhance its clinical impact and nursing recognition.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNursing Reports-
dc.sourceNursing Reports [ISSN 2039-4403], v. 15(3) (Febrero 2025)-
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicas-
dc.subject3201 Ciencias clínicas-
dc.subject.otherStandardized nursing terminology-
dc.subject.otherNursing diagnosis-
dc.subject.otherSurveys and questionnaires-
dc.subject.otherNursing methodology research-
dc.titleAn Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc., Diagnostic Classification Among Spanish Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/nursrep15030079-
dc.identifier.scopus105001137805-
dc.identifier.isi001453261200001-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6226-7374-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0736-8695-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9720-3661-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4807-5277-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1774-4260-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0716-5038-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57213145259-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7801547819-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57575765200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57194419896-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36835723800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid54917531400-
dc.identifier.eissn2039-4403-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.relation.volume15-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Salud-
dc.type2Artículo-
dc.contributor.daisngid130006-
dc.contributor.daisngid11467588-
dc.contributor.daisngid22672942-
dc.contributor.daisngid644386-
dc.contributor.daisngid46249092-
dc.contributor.daisngid15455872-
dc.description.numberofpages14-
dc.utils.revision-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Rodríguez-Suárez, CA-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Mariscal-Crespo, MI-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Hernández-De Luis, MN-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Teixeira-da-Costa, EIM-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:González-de la Torre, H-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Camacho-Bejarano, R-
dc.date.coverdateFebrero 2025-
dc.identifier.ulpgc-
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MED-
dc.description.sjr0,633-
dc.description.jcr2,4-
dc.description.sjrqQ2-
dc.description.jcrqQ1-
dc.description.esciESCI-
dc.description.miaricds9,5-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Enfermería-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Enfermería-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6226-7374-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1774-4260-
crisitem.author.fullNameRodríguez Suárez, Claudio Alberto-
crisitem.author.fullNameGonzález De La Torre, Héctor-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (247,46 kB)
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.