Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/136180
Título: The two different profiles in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and type 2 diabetes mellitus: ischemic and diabetic
Autores/as: Arévalo Lorido, José Carlos
Carretero Gómez, Juana
Conde Martel, Alicia 
Aramburu Bodas, Oscar
Trullás, Joan Carles
Carrasco Sánchez, Francisco Javier
Manzano Espinosa, Luis
Cerqueiro González, Jose Manuel
Moreno García, Carmen
Casado Cerrada, Jesús
Montero Pérez-Barquero, Manuel
Clasificación UNESCO: 32 Ciencias médicas
3205 Medicina interna
320502 Endocrinología
320501 Cardiología
Palabras clave: Coronary artery disease
Diabetic cardiomyopathy
Diabetic cardiomyopathy
Heart failure preserved ejection fraction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Fecha de publicación: 2024
Publicación seriada: Current Medical Research and Opinion 
Resumen: Objective: Two profiles of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can be discerned: those with ischemic and those with diabetic cardiomyopathy (DMC). We aim to analyze clinical differences and prognosis between patients of these two profiles. Material and methods: This cohort study analyzes data from the Spanish Heart Failure Registry, a multicenter, prospective registry that enrolled patients admitted for decompensated heart failure and followed them for one year. Three groups were created according to the presence of T2DM and heart disease depending on the etiology (ischemic when coronary artery disease was present, or DMC when no coronary, valvular, or congenital heart disease; no hypertension; nor infiltrative cardiovascular disease observed on an endomyocardial biopsy). The groups and outcomes were compared. Results: A total of 466 patients were analyzed. Group 1 (n = 210) included patients with ischemic etiology and T2DM. Group 2 (n = 112) included patients with DMC etiology and T2DM. Group 3 (n = 144), a control group, included patients with ischemic etiology and without T2DM. Group 1 had more hypertension and dyslipidemia; group 2 had more atrial fibrillation (AF) and higher body mass index; group 3 had more chronic kidney disease and were older. In the regression analysis, group 3 had a better prognosis than group 1 (reference group) for cardiovascular mortality and HF readmissions (HR 0.44;95%CI 0.2–1; p =.049). Conclusions: Patients with T2DM and HFpEF, who had the poorest prognosis, were of two different profiles: either ischemic or DMC etiology. The first had a higher burden of cardiovascular disease and inflammation whereas the second had a higher prevalence of obesity and AF. The first had a slightly poorer prognosis than the second, though this finding was not significant.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/136180
ISSN: 0300-7995
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2303089
Fuente: Current Medical Research and Opinion [ISSN 0300-7995], v. 40 (3), pp. 359-366
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,15 MB)
Vista completa

Citas SCOPUSTM   

1
actualizado el 16-feb-2025

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.