Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/135490
Título: | High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP During General Anesthesia for Surgery -a Bayesian individual patient data meta-analysis of three randomized clinical trials | Autores/as: | Mazzinari, Guido Zampieri, Fernando G. Ball, Lorenzo Campos, Niklas S. Bluth, Thomas Hemmes, Sabrine N.T. Ferrando, Carlos Librero, Julian Soro, Marina Pelosi, Paolo de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Schultz, Marcus J. Neto, Ary Serpa Neto, Ary Serpa Librero, Julian Pozo, Natividad Ball, Lorenzo Neto, Ary Serpa Severgnini, Paolo Hollmann, Markus W. Binnekade, Jan M. Wrigge, Hermann Canet, Jaume Hiesmayr, Michael Schmid, Werner Tschernko, Edda Jaber, Samir Hedenstierna, Göran Putensen, Christian Marti, Agnes Bacuzzi, Alessandro Brodhun, Alexander Molin, Alexandre Merten, Alfred Parera, Ana Brunelli, Andrea Cortegiani, Andrea Güldner, Andreas Reske, Andreas W. Gratarola, Angelo Giarratano, Antonino Bastin, Bea Heyse, Bjorn Mazul-Sunko, Branka Amantea, Bruno Barberis, Bruno Uhlig, Christopher Marín, Conrado Minguez Celentano, Cristian La Bella, Daniela D'Antini, David Velghe, David Sulemanji, Demet De Robertis, Edoardo Hartmann, Eric Montalto, Francesca Tropea, Francesco Mills, Gary H. Cinnella, Gilda Della Rocca, Giorgio Caggianelli, Girolamo Pellerano, Giulia Mollica, Giuseppina Bugedo, Guillermo Mulier, Jan Paul Vandenbrande, Jeroen Geib, Johann Yaqub, Jonathan Florez, Jorge Mayoral, Juan F. Sprung, Juraj Van Limmen, Jurgen Bos, Lieuwe D.J. de Baerdemaeker, Luc Jamaer, Luc Spagnolo, Luigi Strys, Lydia Gil, Manuel Granell Vidal Melo, Marcos F. Unzueta, Maria Carmen Moral, Maria Victoria Rodríguez Pérez, Aurelio Eduardo* |
Clasificación UNESCO: | 32 Ciencias médicas 3201 Ciencias clínicas 321303 Anestesiología |
Fecha de publicación: | 2024 | Publicación seriada: | Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) | Resumen: | Background: The influence of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications after surgery is still not definitively established. Bayesian analysis can help to gain further insights from the available data and provide a probabilistic framework that is easier to interpret. Our objective was to estimate the posterior probability that the use of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers is associated with reduced postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with intermediate-to-high risk under neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations regarding the treatment effect. Methods: Multilevel Bayesian logistic regression analysis on individual patient data from three randomized clinical trials carried out on surgical patients at Intermediate-to-High Risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The main outcome was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period. We studied the effect of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP Ventilation. Priors were chosen to reflect neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations of the treatment effect. Results: Using a neutral, pessimistic, or optimistic prior, the posterior mean odds ratio (OR) for High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers compared to Low PEEP was 0.85 (95% Credible Interval [CrI] 0.71 to 1.02), 0.87 (0.72 to 1.04), and 0.86 (0.71 to 1.02), respectively. Regardless of prior beliefs, the posterior probability of experiencing a beneficial effect exceeded 90%. Subgroup analysis indicated a more pronounced effect in patients who underwent laparoscopy (OR: 0.67 [0.50 to 0.87]) and those at high risk for PPCs (OR: 0.80 [0.53 to 1.13]). Sensitivity analysis, considering severe postoperative pulmonary complications only or applying a different heterogeneity prior, yielded consistent results. Conclusion: High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers demonstrated a moderate reduction in the probability of PPC occurrence, with a high posterior probability of benefit observed consistently across various prior beliefs, particularly among patients who underwent laparoscopy. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/135490 | ISSN: | 0003-3022 | DOI: | 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005170 | Fuente: | Anesthesiology [ISSN 0003-3022], v. 142(1), pp. 72-97 (enero 2025) |
Colección: | Artículos |
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.