Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/134356
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorCastellano Santana, Pedro Raúlen_US
dc.contributor.authorArmas-Moreno, Claraen_US
dc.contributor.authorModol-Vidal, Maxen_US
dc.contributor.authorSerrano-Munoz, Martaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHernández Rodríguez, José Enriqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorCilleros Pino, Lucíaen_US
dc.contributor.authorEndrenyi, Szilviaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLuque-Gonzalez, Manuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Hernández, Maximinoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T08:55:25Z-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-07T13:49:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-22T08:55:25Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-07T13:49:36Z-
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.issn1557-3087en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/132279-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/134356-
dc.description.abstractAims: To simulate the insertion of the new T-Control (R) urinary catheter with first-year nursing students without previous experience in bladder catheterization and assess the functionality and students' satisfaction compared with the conventional Foley-type catheter. Material and Methods: A comparative, crossover study was conducted with nursing students. After receiving theoretical training, the participants performed the bladder catheterization with both catheters, the conventional Foley and the T-Control (R) catheter, on specific mannikins for bladder catheterization. The students assessed both devices by completing an ad hoc satisfaction questionnaire with 33 questions to compare both devices. Results: T-Control (R) obtained better scores than the conventional Foley catheter in most individual questions. In the same way, T-Control (R) was chosen for more than 65% of participants in nine of the eleven statements of the comparative section, all with a positive connotation. Conclusions: The T-Control (R) catheter was the best-rated device in both the individual and the comparative questions. Most of the students would choose T-Control (R) for their future patients. This study has allowed participants to know and practice a technique in nursing work.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTeaching and Learning in Nursingen_US
dc.sourceTeaching And Learning In Nursing [ISSN 1557-3087], v. 19 (4), p. e695-e702, (Octubre 2024)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject.otherLiving Laben_US
dc.subject.otherT-Control (R)en_US
dc.subject.otherBladder Catheterizationen_US
dc.subject.otherNursingen_US
dc.subject.otherSimulationen_US
dc.titleComparative simulated insertion between T-Control® and Foley-type catheter in nursing students with no prior trainingen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.teln.2024.06.013en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85199207471-
dc.identifier.isi001317979000001-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4122-3545-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcid0009-0004-3534-2059-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8280-0161-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4230-1229-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58065300300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58741600900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58790392400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57217016937-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58661235000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58661234900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58155103400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58739874700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58661288000-
dc.identifier.eissn1557-2013-
dc.description.lastpagee702en_US
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.description.firstpagee695en_US
dc.relation.volume19en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.description.numberofpages8en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Castellano-Santana, PR-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Armas-Moreno, C-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Mòdol-Vidal, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Serrano-Muñoz, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Hernández-Rodríguez, JE-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cilleros-Pino, L-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Endrényi, S-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Luque-González, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Díaz-Hernández, M-
dc.date.coverdateOctubre 2024en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,475-
dc.description.sjrqQ2-
dc.description.esciESCI-
dc.description.miaricds9,7-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Enfermería-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Enfermería-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Enfermería-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Enfermería-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4122-3545-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5437-1902-
crisitem.author.fullNameCastellano Santana, Pedro Raúl-
crisitem.author.fullNameHernández Rodríguez, José Enrique-
crisitem.author.fullNameCilleros Pino, Lucía-
crisitem.author.fullNameDíaz Hernández, Maximino-
Colección:Artículos
Artículos
Adobe PDF (764,11 kB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.