Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/132777
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBoyer, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorHui, Rinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorUrban, Damienen_US
dc.contributor.authorClingan, Philipen_US
dc.contributor.authorSu, Wu Chouen_US
dc.contributor.authorDevaux, Celineen_US
dc.contributor.authorGadgeel, Shirishen_US
dc.contributor.authorGarassino, Marinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeopold, Lanceen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaniel, Jeannieen_US
dc.contributor.authorMunteanu, Mihaela C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSamkari, Aymanen_US
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Yiwenen_US
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Abreu, Delvysen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-27T13:53:46Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-27T13:53:46Z-
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/132777-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The combination of the checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy is effective frontline therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking targetable mutations. Indoleamine 2,3- dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), an enzyme involved in kynurenine production, inhibits immune responses. Inhibition of IDO1 may restore antitumor immunity and augment CPI activity. This trial evaluated addition of epacadostat, a potent and highly selective IDO1 inhibitor, to pembrolizumab and chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC. Methods: ECHO-306/KEYNOTE-715 was a partial double-blind, randomized phase II study of adults with treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC not indicated for EGFR-, ALK-, or ROS1-directed therapy. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms: epacadostat-pembrolizumab-chemotherapy (E + P + C; blinded), epacadostat-pembrolizumab (E + P; open-label) or placebo-pembrolizumab-chemotherapy (PBO + P + C; blinded). Stratification was by PD-L1 tumor proportion score (< 50% vs. ≥ 50%) and tumor histology (non-squamous vs. squamous). A protocol amendment closed enrollment in the open-label E + P group, excluding it from efficacy analyses. Intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered every 21 days and epacadostat 100 mg or matching placebo (oral) twice daily (BID) for ≤ 35 3-week cycles. The primary objective was objective response rate (ORR) for E + P + C vs. PBO + P + C. Results: 178 patients were randomized to E + P + C (n = 91) or PBO + P + C (n = 87); 55 were enrolled in the E + P group. The E + P + C group had a lower confirmed ORR (26.4%; 95% CI 17.7–36.7) than the PBO + P + C group (44.8%; 95% CI 34.1–55.9), with a difference of − 18.5% (95% CI − 32.0 – (− 4.3); one-sided P = 0.9948). The E + P + C group had a numerically higher percentage of confirmed responders with extended response ≥ 6 months (29.2% vs. 15.4%). Circulating kynurenine levels at C1D1 were similar to those at C2D1 in all treatment groups and were not reduced to normal levels with epacadostat 100 mg BID plus P + C. The safety profile of E + P + C was consistent with that for PBO + P + C. Conclusions: Addition of epacadostat 100 mg BID to pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy was generally well tolerated but did not improve ORR in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic NSCLC. Evaluating epacadostat doses that normalize circulating kynurenine in combination with CPIs may help determine the clinical potential of this combination. Trial registration: NCT03322566. Registered October 26, 2017.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Canceren_US
dc.sourceBMC Cancer[EISSN 1471-2407],v. 23 (Suppl 1), (Julio 2024)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject320713 Oncologíaen_US
dc.subject3209 Farmacologíaen_US
dc.subject320806 Quimioterapiaen_US
dc.subject.otherCombination Immunotherapyen_US
dc.subject.otherEpacadostaten_US
dc.subject.otherNon-Small Cell Lung Canceren_US
dc.subject.otherPembrolizumaben_US
dc.titlePembrolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without epacadostat as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, partially double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II studyen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-022-10427-4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85199618332-
dc.identifier.isi001277680600006-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0452-2987-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35509618100-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006029366-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid16311117500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004259060-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57212631761-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid59235390700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57204254346-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid16232960200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36157233300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57974195600-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57217196865-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57222264028-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57218204872-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid23989750700-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2407-
dc.identifier.issueSuppl 1-
dc.relation.volume23en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.description.numberofpages12en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Boyer, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Hui, RN-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Urban, D-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Clingan, P-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Su, WC-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Devaux, C-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gadgeel, S-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Garassino, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Leopold, L-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Daniel, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Munteanu, MC-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Samkari, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Luo, YW-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Abreu, DR-
dc.date.coverdateJulio 2024en_US
dc.identifier.supplement1-
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr1,087
dc.description.jcr3,4
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds10,8
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Nanomaterials and Corrosion-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0506-1366-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Ingeniería Mecánica-
crisitem.author.fullNameRodríguez Abreu, Delvys-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,54 MB)
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Mar 30, 2025

Page view(s)

37
checked on Dec 14, 2024

Download(s)

52
checked on Dec 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.