Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/132777
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBoyer, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorHui, Rinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorUrban, Damienen_US
dc.contributor.authorClingan, Philipen_US
dc.contributor.authorSu, Wu Chouen_US
dc.contributor.authorDevaux, Celineen_US
dc.contributor.authorGadgeel, Shirishen_US
dc.contributor.authorGarassino, Marinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeopold, Lanceen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaniel, Jeannieen_US
dc.contributor.authorMunteanu, Mihaela C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSamkari, Aymanen_US
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Yiwenen_US
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Abreu, Delvysen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-27T13:53:46Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-27T13:53:46Z-
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/132777-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The combination of the checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy is effective frontline therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking targetable mutations. Indoleamine 2,3- dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), an enzyme involved in kynurenine production, inhibits immune responses. Inhibition of IDO1 may restore antitumor immunity and augment CPI activity. This trial evaluated addition of epacadostat, a potent and highly selective IDO1 inhibitor, to pembrolizumab and chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC. Methods: ECHO-306/KEYNOTE-715 was a partial double-blind, randomized phase II study of adults with treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC not indicated for EGFR-, ALK-, or ROS1-directed therapy. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms: epacadostat-pembrolizumab-chemotherapy (E + P + C; blinded), epacadostat-pembrolizumab (E + P; open-label) or placebo-pembrolizumab-chemotherapy (PBO + P + C; blinded). Stratification was by PD-L1 tumor proportion score (< 50% vs. ≥ 50%) and tumor histology (non-squamous vs. squamous). A protocol amendment closed enrollment in the open-label E + P group, excluding it from efficacy analyses. Intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered every 21 days and epacadostat 100 mg or matching placebo (oral) twice daily (BID) for ≤ 35 3-week cycles. The primary objective was objective response rate (ORR) for E + P + C vs. PBO + P + C. Results: 178 patients were randomized to E + P + C (n = 91) or PBO + P + C (n = 87); 55 were enrolled in the E + P group. The E + P + C group had a lower confirmed ORR (26.4%; 95% CI 17.7–36.7) than the PBO + P + C group (44.8%; 95% CI 34.1–55.9), with a difference of − 18.5% (95% CI − 32.0 – (− 4.3); one-sided P = 0.9948). The E + P + C group had a numerically higher percentage of confirmed responders with extended response ≥ 6 months (29.2% vs. 15.4%). Circulating kynurenine levels at C1D1 were similar to those at C2D1 in all treatment groups and were not reduced to normal levels with epacadostat 100 mg BID plus P + C. The safety profile of E + P + C was consistent with that for PBO + P + C. Conclusions: Addition of epacadostat 100 mg BID to pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy was generally well tolerated but did not improve ORR in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic NSCLC. Evaluating epacadostat doses that normalize circulating kynurenine in combination with CPIs may help determine the clinical potential of this combination. Trial registration: NCT03322566. Registered October 26, 2017.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Canceren_US
dc.sourceBMC Cancer[EISSN 1471-2407],v. 23 (Suppl 1), (Julio 2024)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject320713 Oncologíaen_US
dc.subject3209 Farmacologíaen_US
dc.subject320806 Quimioterapiaen_US
dc.subject.otherCombination Immunotherapyen_US
dc.subject.otherEpacadostaten_US
dc.subject.otherNon-Small Cell Lung Canceren_US
dc.subject.otherPembrolizumaben_US
dc.titlePembrolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without epacadostat as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, partially double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II studyen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-022-10427-4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85199618332-
dc.identifier.isi001277680600006-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0452-2987-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35509618100-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006029366-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid16311117500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004259060-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57212631761-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid59235390700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57204254346-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid16232960200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36157233300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57974195600-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57217196865-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57222264028-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57218204872-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid23989750700-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2407-
dc.identifier.issueSuppl 1-
dc.relation.volume23en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.description.numberofpages12en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Boyer, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Hui, RN-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Urban, D-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Clingan, P-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Su, WC-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Devaux, C-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gadgeel, S-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Garassino, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Leopold, L-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Daniel, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Munteanu, MC-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Samkari, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Luo, YW-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Abreu, DR-
dc.date.coverdateJulio 2024en_US
dc.identifier.supplement1-
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr1,087
dc.description.jcr3,8
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds10,8
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Nanomaterials and Corrosion-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0506-1366-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Ingeniería Mecánica-
crisitem.author.fullNameRodríguez Abreu, Delvys-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,54 MB)
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.