Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/130500
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorSalas, B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFerrera Alayón, Lauraen_US
dc.contributor.authorEspinosa-Lopez, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVera-Rosas, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSalcedo, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKannemann, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlayon, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChicas-Sett, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLloret Sáez-Bravo, Martaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLara Jiménez, Pedro Carlosen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-17T14:50:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-17T14:50:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.issn2405-6308en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/130500-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) allows for the administration of a higher biologically effective doses (BED), that would be essential to achieve durable tumor control. Escalating treatment doses need a very accurate tumor positioning and motion control during radiotherapy. The aim of this study to assess the feasibility and safety of a Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) dose-escalated protocol at 45 Gy, 50 Gy and 55 Gy in 5 consecutive daily fractions, in Border Line Resectable Pancreatic Cancer (BRCP) /Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC) by means of a standard LINAC platform. Methods: Patients diagnosed of BRPC/LAPC, candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT, in four university hospitals of the province of Las Palmas (Canary Islands, Spain) were included in this prospective study. Radiotherapy was administered using standard technology (LINACS) with advanced positioning (Lipiodol (R) and metallic stent used as fiducial markers) and tumor motion control (4D, DBH, Calypso (R)). There were 3 planned dose-escalated SIB groups, 45 Gy/5f (9 patients) 50 Gy/5f (9 + 9 patients) and 55 Gy/5f (9 patients). The defined primary end points of the study were the safety and feasibility of the proposed treatment protocol. Secondary endpoints included radiological tumor response after SBRT, local control and survival. Results: From June 2017 to December 2022, sixty-two patients were initially assessed for eligibility in the study in the four participating centers, and 49 were candidates for chemotherapy (CHT). Forty-one were referred to radiotherapy after CHT and 33 finally were treated by escalated-dose SIB, 45 Gy (9 patients) 50 Gy (16 patients), 55 Gy(8 patients). All patients completed the scheduled treatment and no acute or late severe (>= grade3) gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. Local response was analyzed by CT/MRI two months after the end of SBRT. Ten patients (31,25 %) achieved objective response (2/9:45 Gy, 5/15:50 Gy, 3/8:55 Gy). Follow-up was closed as July 2023. Freedom from local progression at 1-2y were 89,3% (95 %CI:83,4-95,2%) and 66 % (95 %CI:54,6-77,4%) respectively. The 1-2y survival rates were 95,7% (95 %CI:91,4-100 % and 48,6% (95 %CI:37,7-59,5%) respectively. Conclusion: These promising results should be confirmed by further studies with larger sample size and extended follow-up period.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and translational radiation oncologyen_US
dc.sourceClinical And Translational Radiation Oncology [2405-6308], v. 45, (Marzo 2024)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject320713 Oncologíaen_US
dc.subject.otherStereotactic Body Radiotherapyen_US
dc.subject.otherRadiation-Therapyen_US
dc.subject.otherOutcomesen_US
dc.subject.otherChemotherapyen_US
dc.subject.otherDiagnosisen_US
dc.subject.otherSurvivalen_US
dc.subject.otherLipiodolen_US
dc.subject.otherTrialen_US
dc.subject.otherLapcen_US
dc.subject.otherBrpcen_US
dc.subject.otherSbrten_US
dc.subject.otherSiben_US
dc.subject.otherEscalated Doseen_US
dc.subject.otherFeasibilityen_US
dc.subject.otherSafetyen_US
dc.titleDose-escalated SBRT for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Feasibility, safety and preliminary clinical results of a multicenter studyen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100753en_US
dc.identifier.isi001195260000001-
dc.identifier.eissn2405-6308-
dc.relation.volume45en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid55692791-
dc.contributor.daisngid52764237-
dc.contributor.daisngid56572340-
dc.contributor.daisngid48679263-
dc.contributor.daisngid52937302-
dc.contributor.daisngid23438584-
dc.contributor.daisngid50661818-
dc.contributor.daisngid37738395-
dc.contributor.daisngid44598479-
dc.contributor.daisngid23941271-
dc.description.numberofpages8en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Salas, B-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Ferrera-Alayón, L-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Espinosa-López, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Vera-Rosas, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Salcedo, E-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Kannemann, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Alayon, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Chicas-Sett, R-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Lloret, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Lara, PC-
dc.date.coverdateMarzo 2024en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,999
dc.description.jcr3,1
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ2
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Clínicas-
crisitem.author.fullNameFerrera Alayón, Laura-
crisitem.author.fullNameLloret Sáez-Bravo, Marta-
crisitem.author.fullNameLara Jiménez, Pedro Carlos-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,47 MB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.