Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/130360
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorDávila Batista, Verónicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMolina, Antonio J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Villa, Taniaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRomaguera, Doraen_US
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Gómez, Beatrizen_US
dc.contributor.authorVilorio-Marqués, Lauraen_US
dc.contributor.authorDierssen-Sotos, Trinidaden_US
dc.contributor.authorAltzibar, Jone M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, Victoren_US
dc.contributor.authorArdanaz, Evaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSalcedo-Bellido, Inmaculadaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Tardon, Guillermoen_US
dc.contributor.authorCapelo, Rocioen_US
dc.contributor.authorSalas, Doloresen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcos-Gragera, Rafaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuerta, José Maríaen_US
dc.contributor.authorde Sanjosé, Silviaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSierra, María Ángelesen_US
dc.contributor.authorCanga-Presa, José M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Acebo, Inesen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmiano, Pilaren_US
dc.contributor.authorPollan, Marinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAragones, Nuriaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCastaño-Vinyals, Gemmaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKogevinas, Manolisen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartín, Vicenteen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-13T13:57:55Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-13T13:57:55Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-6643en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/130360-
dc.description.abstractBackgound: Traditional anthropometrics such as body mass index (BMI) or waist circumference (WC) do not fully capture the complex biology of body fat (BF) in the elderly. The Clinica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator (CUN-BAE) index, based on BMI, is proposed as a better indicator of BF. However, its relation with BMI is not clear. The aim was to compare the agreement between CUN-BAE, BMI, and WC in those aged ≥50 years. Methods: A cross-sectional sample of 3153 Caucasian healthy adults was taken from the MCC-Spain study. The Pearson’s correlation and its 95% confidence interval (CI), adiposity distribution, and Kappa Index (95%CI) were calculated. Results: The correlation of CUN-BAE with WC is 0.18 (95%CI 0.14–0.21) and that with BMI is moderate (r 0.58; 95%CI 0.55–0.60), but both increased strongly by sex. Agreement (normal weight/overweight/obesity) of CUN-BAE with BMI is 7% and with WC is 18%. Conclusions: The correlation and the degree of agreement of CUN-BAE with BMI and WC are low in individuals aged over 50, but it is higher by sex. Thus, this different criterion of obesity may have clinical applications. More studies with a gold standard are needed to evaluate the CUN-BAE in elderly adults.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNutrientsen_US
dc.sourceNutrients [2072-6643], v. 12 (4):996 (Abril 2020)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject3206 Ciencias de la nutriciónen_US
dc.subject.otherAgreementen_US
dc.subject.otherAnthropometric measuresen_US
dc.subject.otherBody siteen_US
dc.subject.otherNutritional statusen_US
dc.subject.otherObesityen_US
dc.subject.otherOlder adultsen_US
dc.titleThe relation of CUN-BAE index with body mass index and waist circumference in adults aged 50 to 85 years: The MCC-Spain studyen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/nu12040996en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32260185-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85083022857-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.relation.volume12en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages12en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateAbril 2020en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr1,418
dc.description.jcr5,717
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Diabetes y endocrinología aplicada-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Clínicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8888-395X-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameDávila Batista, Verónica-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (750,69 kB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.