Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/129678
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Jessica Mendesen_US
dc.contributor.authorMerencio, Fabianaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVillagran, Ximenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWesolowski, Veronicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorEstevam, Renataen_US
dc.contributor.authorFuller, Benjamin T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDeBlasis, Pauloen_US
dc.contributor.authorGilson, Simon-Pierre Noël Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorGuiserix, Danaéen_US
dc.contributor.authorMéjean, Paulineen_US
dc.contributor.authorFiguti, Levyen_US
dc.contributor.authorFarias, Deisien_US
dc.contributor.authorGuimaraes, Geovanen_US
dc.contributor.authorStrauss, Andreen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaouen, Klerviaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-01T15:09:21Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-01T15:09:21Z-
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/129678-
dc.description.abstractBrazilian coastal archaeology is renowned for its numerous and large shellmounds (sambaquis), which had been continuously occupied from at least 8000 to 1000 years cal BP. However, changes in their structure and material culture in the late Holocene have led to different hypotheses concerning their ecological and cultural changes. The archaeological site Galheta IV (ca. 1300 to 500 years cal BP) offers new insights into the complexity of the late coastal occupation in southern Brazil. Our attempt was to determine whether Galheta IV can be classified as a sambaqui site, or if it belongs to a Southern proto-Jê settlement. Here, we reassessed Galheta’s collections and applied a multi-proxy approach using: new 14C dates, zooarchaeology, δ13C and δ15N isotopes in bulk collagen and 87Sr/86Srenamel isotopic ratios from eight human individuals, ceramics analysis, and FTIR. The results indicate an intense exploitation of marine resources, with an area designated for processing animals located at the opposite side of the funerary areas. Bone tools and specific species of animals were found as burial accompaniments. No evidence of human cremations was detected. 87Sr/86Sr results indicate that the eight human individuals always lived on the coast, and did not come from the inland. The pottery analysis confirms the association with Itararé-Taquara, but contrary to what was assumed by previous studies, the pottery seems related to other coastal sites, and not to the highlands. In light of these findings, we propose that Galheta IV can be considered a funerary mound resulting from long and continuous interactions between shellmound and Southern proto-Jê populations. This study not only enhances our understanding of the late coastal occupation dynamics in southern Brazil but also underscores its importance in reshaping current interpretations of shellmound cultural changes over time.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONEen_US
dc.sourcePLoS ONE [EISSN 1932-6203], v. 19 (3), e0300684en_US
dc.subject550501 Arqueologíaen_US
dc.subject251010 Procesos litorales o sublitoralesen_US
dc.titleLate shellmound occupation in southern Brazil: A multi-proxy study of the Galheta IV archaeological siteen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0300684en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85188334035-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58070198400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57216400923-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid33768142000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid15830680600-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58515068900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7102974742-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55891225200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58950362600-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57786664900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56442531300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid8562919500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58949715700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58515515900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35265086800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid49663654600-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.issue3 March-
dc.relation.volume19en_US
dc.investigacionArtes y Humanidadesen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages31en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateMarzo 2024en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-HUMen_US
dc.description.sjr0,839
dc.description.jcr3,7
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds10,7
dc.description.erihplusERIH PLUS
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.fullNameGilson, Simon-Pierre Noël R-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (3,13 MB)
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Nov 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Nov 17, 2024

Page view(s)

59
checked on Sep 7, 2024

Download(s)

29
checked on Sep 7, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.