Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/128758
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVillar, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Martín, JMen_US
dc.contributor.authorFerrando, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorAñón, JMen_US
dc.contributor.authorDel Saz-Ortíz, AMen_US
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Lamas, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorBueno-González, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez-Berrot, AMen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeinado, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorAndaluz-Ojeda, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Higueras, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorVidal, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández, MMen_US
dc.contributor.authorMora-Ordoñez, JMen_US
dc.contributor.authorMurcia, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorTarancón, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorMerayo, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorPérez, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorRomera, MAen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlba, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorPestaña, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Suárez, Pedro Miguelen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández, RLen_US
dc.contributor.authorSteyerberg, EWen_US
dc.contributor.authorBerra, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorSlutsky, ASen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-01T19:50:38Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-01T19:50:38Z-
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/128758-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at the time of ARDS diagnosis is weakly associated with mortality. We hypothesized that setting a PaO2/FiO2 threshold in 150 mm Hg at 24 h from moderate/severe ARDS diagnosis would improve predictions of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We conducted an ancillary study in 1303 patients with moderate to severe ARDS managed with lung-protective ventilation enrolled consecutively in four prospective multicenter cohorts in a network of ICUs. The first three cohorts were pooled (n = 1000) as a testing cohort; the fourth cohort (n = 303) served as a confirmatory cohort. Based on the thresholds for PaO2/FiO2 (150 mm Hg) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (10 cm H2O), the patients were classified into four possible subsets at baseline and at 24 h using a standardized PEEP-FiO2 approach: (I) PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 150 at PEEP < 10, (II) PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 150 at PEEP ≥ 10, (III) PaO2/FiO2 < 150 at PEEP < 10, and (IV) PaO2/FiO2 < 150 at PEEP ≥ 10. Primary outcome was death in the ICU. Results: ICU mortalities were similar in the testing and confirmatory cohorts (375/1000, 37.5% vs. 112/303, 37.0%, respectively). At baseline, most patients from the testing cohort (n = 792/1000, 79.2%) had a PaO2/FiO2 < 150, with similar mortality among the four subsets (p = 0.23). When assessed at 24 h, ICU mortality increased with an advance in the subset: 17.9%, 22.8%, 40.0%, and 49.3% (p < 0.0001). The findings were replicated in the confirmatory cohort (p < 0.0001). However, independent of the PEEP levels, patients with PaO2/FiO2 < 150 at 24 h followed a distinct 30-day ICU survival compared with patients with PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 150 (hazard ratio 2.8, 95% CI 2.2–3.5, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Subsets based on PaO2/FiO2 thresholds of 150 mm Hg assessed after 24 h of moderate/severe ARDS diagnosis are clinically relevant for establishing prognosis, and are helpful for selecting adjunctive therapies for hypoxemia and for enrolling patients into therapeutic trials.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Clinical Medicine [2077-0383], v. 11(19):5724 (Septiembre 2022)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject3201 Ciencias clínicasen_US
dc.subject.otherLung-protective ventilationen_US
dc.subject.otherMortalityen_US
dc.subject.otherStratificationen_US
dc.subject.otherARDS criteriaen_US
dc.subject.otherPredictionen_US
dc.subject.otherOutcomeen_US
dc.titleRespiratory Subsets in Patients with Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome for Early Prediction of Deathen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Reviewen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm11195724en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85139822239-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000866751500001-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5687-3562-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6816-4157-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7311-9809-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8167-0871-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2879-8152-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2587-9923-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2702-2093-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.identifier.issue19-
dc.relation.volume11en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Reseñaen_US
dc.description.numberofpages17en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateSeptiembre 2022en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,935
dc.description.jcr3,9
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds10,5
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Patología y Tecnología médica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8158-7872-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameRodríguez Suárez, Pedro Miguel-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,05 MB)
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Mar 30, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on Mar 30, 2025

Page view(s)

47
checked on Jul 6, 2024

Download(s)

10
checked on Jul 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.