Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/123222
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQuirós Pozo, Raquelen_US
dc.contributor.authorConcu, Daniloen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobaina Robaina, Lidia Estheren_US
dc.contributor.authorVallainc, Darioen_US
dc.contributor.authorLoi, Barbaraen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoo Filgueira, Francisco Javieren_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T08:07:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-05T08:07:20Z-
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/123222-
dc.description.abstractThe sustainable expansion of aquaculture relies on a sufficient supply of eggs and larvae, which are the first step of life cycle management. However, marine fish larval rearing generally depends on live feed production, which needs additional facilities and labor. The flathead grey mullet (Mugil cephalus), a promising species for aquaculture diversification, has a precocious digestive system development, supporting the feasibility of early weaning strategies. For these reasons, this study evaluated survival, growth, proximate and fatty acid composition, and gene expression of Mugil cephalus larvae reared under three different weaning protocols. Three co-feeding treatments, two with different Artemia sp. concentrations (A100 and A50, 2 and 1 Artemia sp. mL−1 day−1, respectively) and one with only rotifers administered as live feed along the feeding trial (A0), were assessed from 22 to 36 days post-hatching (dph). The A0 treatment performed better in survival (64.79 ± 7.40%) than the A100 protocol (32.46 ± 12.82%). In contrast, the larvae of the A100 treatment presented significantly higher final length (15.51 ± 0.86 mm) than those of the A0 treatment (12.19 ± 1.45 mm) and higher final weight (41.28 ± 1.48 mg) than those of the A50 and A0 treatments (31.23 ± 3.65 mg and 24.03 ± 7.99 mg, respectively). On the other hand, the expression of digestive enzyme- and somatotropic factor-related genes did not show differences between treatments. The present results support the convenience of treatment A0 in maximizing survival, as rotifers should be maintained until 30–32 dph (until a total larval length of at least 10 mm). However, to improve growth and minimize size dispersion, Artemia sp. addition is recommended from day 26 to day 29 post-hatching (total larval length of 8 to 9 mm).en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnimalsen_US
dc.sourceAnimals [EISSN 2076-2615], v. 13 (10), (Mayo 2023)en_US
dc.subject310502 Pisciculturaen_US
dc.subject310507 Hábitos de alimentaciónen_US
dc.subject240109 Crecimiento animalen_US
dc.subject.otherArtemiaspen_US
dc.subject.otherDiversificationen_US
dc.subject.otherGene Expressionen_US
dc.subject.otherMugilidaeen_US
dc.subject.otherRotifersen_US
dc.titleEffects of Different Co-Feeding Protocols on the Early Weaning of Flathead Grey Mullet (Mugil cephalus) Larvaeen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ani13101685en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85160204318-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4135-1838-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2816-6101-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4857-6693-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2471-4513-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4013-2601-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9660-230X-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57973441600-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57260197900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603401174-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57110344800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57056029800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid22935309300-
dc.identifier.eissn2076-2615-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.relation.volume13en_US
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateMayo 2023en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
dc.description.sjr0,698
dc.description.jcr3,0
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds10,5
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4857-6693-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9660-230X-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.fullNameQuirós Pozo,Raquel-
crisitem.author.fullNameRobaina Robaina, Lidia Esther-
crisitem.author.fullNameRoo Filgueira, Francisco Javier-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,96 MB)
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.