Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/118975
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbramic Petkovic, Andrejen_US
dc.contributor.authorCordero Penín, Víctoren_US
dc.contributor.authorHaroun Tabraue, Ricardo Jesúsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T12:22:54Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-20T12:22:54Z-
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.issn0195-9255en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/118975-
dc.description.abstractThe expected increase in the offshore wind farm (OWF) developments to meet global decarbonisation targets is raising concerns in the scientific community about the ecological health of the marine environment. The present contribution has conducted an extensive literature review on the environmental effects and changes that the OWF can pose on the Good Environmental Status (GES) described by the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive (2008/56/EC). Consequently, an environmental impact assessment (EIA) checklist has been developed to encompass the construction, operative, and decommissioning phases of the OWF and aimed at enabling the evaluation of whether the OWF developments are conducted compatibly with the maintenance of the GES of the marine environment or not. We have then applied to our case study the developed EIA-GES checklist through a multi-criteria analysis, to evaluate and map the potential level of impact expected from the OWF developments over ca. 45.613,5 Km2 of a marine area off an Atlantic archipelago. Particularly, biogeographic aspects, oceanographic conditions, and OWF location sites will ultimately determine the overall impact of the OWF development. In our study area, results suggest that the OWF developments would have a minor or null impact on the GES for ca. 78% of the marine waters assessed. Besides, we have discussed our EIA-GES checklist applicability to decide on appropriate possible impact mitigation measures, following a case-by-case approach and identifying key ecological information that could be collected by the OWF developers during the EIA study. These surveys can support environmental authorities by providing with more insights to assess the GES status while identifying information gaps and areas to improve monitoring and data gathering for the GES maintenance. Finally, we discussed performing EIAs based on the historical datasets, and recommend reinforcement of the time series of data with updated surveys within and around OWF sites to confirm the marine environment's state.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relationProgreso de la Planificación Sostenible de Areas Marinas en Macaronesiaen_US
dc.relationBases para la planificación sostenible de áreas marinas en la Macaronesiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Impact Assessment Reviewen_US
dc.sourceEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review [ISSN 0195-9255], v. 97, (Noviembre 2022)en_US
dc.subject332203 Generadores de energíaen_US
dc.subject2510 Oceanografíaen_US
dc.subject3308 Ingeniería y tecnología del medio ambienteen_US
dc.subject.otherBefore-After-Control-Impacten_US
dc.subject.otherCanary Islandsen_US
dc.subject.otherEia Frameworken_US
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental Impact Assessmenten_US
dc.subject.otherGood Environmental Statusen_US
dc.subject.otherMarine Strategy Framework Directiveen_US
dc.subject.otherOffshore Wind Energyen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental impact assessment framework for offshore wind energy developments based on the marine Good Environmental Statusen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106862en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85135503869-
dc.identifier.isi000860793400006-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55246038900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57226127957-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603827643-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6432-
dc.relation.volume97en_US
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid18986265-
dc.contributor.daisngid15433177-
dc.contributor.daisngid31977504-
dc.description.numberofpages14en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Abramic, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cordero-Penin, V-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Haroun, R-
dc.date.coverdateNoviembre 2022en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
dc.description.sjr1,362-
dc.description.jcr7,9-
dc.description.sjrqQ1-
dc.description.jcrqQ1-
dc.description.ssciSSCI-
dc.description.miaricds11,0-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Biodiversidad y Conservación-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Biodiversidad y Conservación-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Biodiversidad y Conservación-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1348-692X-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.fullNameAbramic Petrovic,Andrej-
crisitem.author.fullNameCordero Penín, Víctor-
crisitem.author.fullNameHaroun Tabraue, Ricardo Jesús-
crisitem.project.principalinvestigatorHaroun Tabraue, Ricardo Jesús-
crisitem.project.principalinvestigatorHaroun Tabraue, Ricardo Jesús-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,61 MB)
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
checked on Apr 21, 2024

Page view(s)

90
checked on Feb 10, 2024

Download(s)

20
checked on Feb 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.