Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/117200
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorAlonso González, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.authorParga Dans, Evaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAcosta Dacal, Andrea Carolinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorZumbado Peña, Manuel Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorPérez Luzardo, Octavio Luisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-18T13:46:43Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-18T13:46:43Z-
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-1575en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/117200-
dc.description.abstractThe surface and output of organic agriculture is growing steadily in recent years, being generally seen as a healthier, safer and more sustainable alternative to conventional agriculture. Comparisons between organic and conventional products are nonetheless scarce in the literature, especially in the case of wine. The aim of this study was to compare sulphite content and pesticide residues in both soils and wines under organic and conventional production. Fourteen samples of organic and conventional wines and vineyard soils were collected in pairs for each of the seven wine-producing islands of the Canary Islands. A QuEChERS-based method was employed to detect 218 pesticides and 49 POPs. Sulphites were measured by potentiometric titration with a double electrode. On average, higher levels of sulphites were found in conventional wines. Similarly, conventional wines presented higher numbers and concentrations of pesticide residues both in soils and wines than their organic counterparts. The overall pesticide concentrations in our sample was 4.2 µg/kg. Conventional wines presented a considerably higher average concentration than organic wines (8.2 against 0.25 µg/kg). In turn, concentrations in conventional soils averaged 8.7 against 2.8 µg/kg in organic soils, a 68.19 % lower residue concentration. The analytes most commonly found were PCB 28, p,p′-DDE, tebuconazole and the metabolite 4,4′-dichlorobenzophenone in soils and mefenoxam, tebuconazole, fluopyram and boscalid in wines. No single wine exceeded the 10 % of the MRLs established by the European Union for wine grapes. However, the presence of low levels of pesticides in organic wines should be monitored.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Food Composition and Analysisen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Food Composition and Analysis [ISSN 0889-1575], v. 112, 14714, (Septiembre 2022)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject320611 Toxicidad de los alimentosen_US
dc.subject320605 Agentes patógenos de los alimentosen_US
dc.subject.otherAlcoholic Beveragesen_US
dc.subject.otherFood Toxicologyen_US
dc.subject.otherOrganic Agricultureen_US
dc.subject.otherPesticidesen_US
dc.subject.otherSulphitesen_US
dc.subject.otherWineen_US
dc.titleDifferences in the levels of sulphites and pesticide residues in soils and wines and under organic and conventional production methodsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104714en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85133364334-
dc.identifier.isi000829406300003-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57382525300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55115802300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56096659300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57383840900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57193531956-
dc.identifier.eissn1096-0481-
dc.relation.volume112en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid22159946-
dc.contributor.daisngid31986534-
dc.contributor.daisngid32526642-
dc.contributor.daisngid13053598-
dc.contributor.daisngid31876730-
dc.description.numberofpages8en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gonzalez, PA-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Dans, EP-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Dacal, ACA-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Pena, MZ-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Luzardo, OP-
dc.date.coverdateSeptiembre 2022en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,651-
dc.description.jcr4,3-
dc.description.sjrqQ1-
dc.description.jcrqQ2-
dc.description.miaricds11,0-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medio Ambiente y Salud-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medio Ambiente y Salud-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Clínicas-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medio Ambiente y Salud-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Clínicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1272-0545-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1534-7758-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4153-3028-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameAcosta Dacal, Andrea Carolina-
crisitem.author.fullNameZumbado Peña, Manuel Luis-
crisitem.author.fullNamePérez Luzardo, Octavio Luis-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (780,86 kB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.