Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/114269
Título: | Rationale and Study Design for an Individualized Perioperative Open Lung Ventilatory Strategy in Patients on One-Lung Ventilation (iPROVE-OLV) | Autores/as: | Carramiñana, Albert Ferrando, Carlos Unzueta, M. Carmen Navarro, Ricard Suárez-Sipmann, Fernando Tusman, Gerardo Garutti, Ignacio Soro, Marina Pozo, Natividad Librero, Julián Gallego, Lucía Ramasco, Fernando Rabanal, José M. Rodriguez, Aurelio Sastre, José Martínez Milán, Jesús María Coves, Silvia López García, Patricia Aguirre-Puig, Pilar Yepes, José Lluch, Aitana López-Herrera, Daniel Leal, Sonsoles Vives, Marc Bellas, Soledad Socorro, Tania Trespalacios, Ramón Salazar, Claudia J. Mugarra, Ana Cinnella, Gilda Spadaro, Savino Futier, Emmanuel Ferrer, Leopoldo Cabrera, María Ribeiro, Helder Celestino, Catarina Kucur, Evrim Cervantes, Oriol Morocho, Diego Delphy, Dalia Ramos, Carolina Villar, Jesús Belda, Javier |
Clasificación UNESCO: | 32 Ciencias médicas 3205 Medicina interna |
Palabras clave: | Mechanical ventilation One-lung ventilation Positive end-expiratory pressure Postoperative pulmonary complications Recruitment maneuvers |
Fecha de publicación: | 2019 | Publicación seriada: | Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia | Resumen: | Objective: The aim of this clinical trial is to examine whether it is possible to reduce postoperative complications using an individualized perioperative ventilatory strategy versus using a standard lung-protective ventilation strategy in patients scheduled for thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation. Design: International, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Setting: A network of university hospitals. Participants: The study comprises 1,380 patients scheduled for thoracic surgery. Interventions: The individualized group will receive intraoperative recruitment maneuvers followed by individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (open lung approach) during the intraoperative period plus postoperative ventilatory support with high-flow nasal cannula, whereas the control group will be managed with conventional lung-protective ventilation. Measurements and Main Results: Individual and total number of postoperative complications, including atelectasis, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, pneumonia, acute lung injury; unplanned readmission and reintubation; length of stay and death in the critical care unit and in the hospital will be analyzed for both groups. The authors hypothesize that the intraoperative application of an open lung approach followed by an individual indication of high-flow nasal cannula in the postoperative period will reduce pulmonary complications and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/114269 | ISSN: | 1053-0770 | DOI: | 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.01.056 | Fuente: | Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia [ISSN 1053-0770], v. 33 (9), p. 2492-2502 (Septiembre 2019) |
Colección: | Artículos |
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.