Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/114269
Title: | Rationale and Study Design for an Individualized Perioperative Open Lung Ventilatory Strategy in Patients on One-Lung Ventilation (iPROVE-OLV) | Authors: | Carramiñana, Albert Ferrando, Carlos Unzueta, M. Carmen Navarro, Ricard Suárez-Sipmann, Fernando Tusman, Gerardo Garutti, Ignacio Soro, Marina Pozo, Natividad Librero, Julián Gallego, Lucía Ramasco, Fernando Rabanal, José M. Rodriguez, Aurelio Sastre, José Martínez Milán, Jesús María Coves, Silvia López García, Patricia Aguirre-Puig, Pilar Yepes, José Lluch, Aitana López-Herrera, Daniel Leal, Sonsoles Vives, Marc Bellas, Soledad Socorro, Tania Trespalacios, Ramón Salazar, Claudia J. Mugarra, Ana Cinnella, Gilda Spadaro, Savino Futier, Emmanuel Ferrer, Leopoldo Cabrera, María Ribeiro, Helder Celestino, Catarina Kucur, Evrim Cervantes, Oriol Morocho, Diego Delphy, Dalia Ramos, Carolina Villar, Jesús Belda, Javier |
UNESCO Clasification: | 32 Ciencias médicas 3205 Medicina interna |
Keywords: | Mechanical ventilation One-lung ventilation Positive end-expiratory pressure Postoperative pulmonary complications Recruitment maneuvers |
Issue Date: | 2019 | Journal: | Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia | Abstract: | Objective: The aim of this clinical trial is to examine whether it is possible to reduce postoperative complications using an individualized perioperative ventilatory strategy versus using a standard lung-protective ventilation strategy in patients scheduled for thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation. Design: International, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Setting: A network of university hospitals. Participants: The study comprises 1,380 patients scheduled for thoracic surgery. Interventions: The individualized group will receive intraoperative recruitment maneuvers followed by individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (open lung approach) during the intraoperative period plus postoperative ventilatory support with high-flow nasal cannula, whereas the control group will be managed with conventional lung-protective ventilation. Measurements and Main Results: Individual and total number of postoperative complications, including atelectasis, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, pneumonia, acute lung injury; unplanned readmission and reintubation; length of stay and death in the critical care unit and in the hospital will be analyzed for both groups. The authors hypothesize that the intraoperative application of an open lung approach followed by an individual indication of high-flow nasal cannula in the postoperative period will reduce pulmonary complications and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/114269 | ISSN: | 1053-0770 | DOI: | 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.01.056 | Source: | Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia [ISSN 1053-0770], v. 33 (9), p. 2492-2502 (Septiembre 2019) |
Appears in Collections: | Artículos |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
15
checked on Nov 24, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
13
checked on Nov 24, 2024
Page view(s)
96
checked on Jun 29, 2024
Download(s)
348
checked on Jun 29, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Share
Export metadata
Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.