Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/112828
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFuertes, Victoren_US
dc.contributor.authorFrances, Mónicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCasarrubios, José M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Palacios, Javieren_US
dc.contributor.authorMartín González, Juan Manuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorLoro Ferrer, Juan Franciscoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-02T11:06:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-02T11:06:24Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn2227-684Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/112828-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Implant-based immediate approach remains to be a first line option for reconstruction of mastectomy defects. When combined with post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) two different schemas are possible: radiating the temporary tissue expander (TTE) or the permanent implant (PI). The present article intends to be the biggest cohort meta-analysis to the date comparing reconstructive failure (RF) rate in these two scenarios: PMRT to TE compared with PMRT to PI. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed on PUBMED/MEDLINE. The following key words were chosen: Breast Reconstruction AND Implant based AND Immediate. The time limit applied was from January 2008 to January 2019. We selected ten articles (n=1,130) to perform a meta-analysis due to the similarity of their approaches. Secondly, we did a simple literature review in order to identify some variables possibly working as predicting factors for RF. Results: Previous meta-analysis are analysed. Some variables possibly working as risk factors for RF are summarized. We performed a meta-analysis in two scenarios: a fixed-effect model and a random effect model. For the random effect model an OR of 1.85 was obtained (0.96, 3.57; P=0.067). A funnel plot is performed showing no publication bias exists. Conclusions: There is a tendency towards a higher RF rate when the TTE is irradiated compared with the irradiation of the PI. Further studies trying to elucidate the influence of the suggested risk factors for RF have to be performed to stablish a consensus about the indications and contraindications of this reconstructive modality.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGland Surgeryen_US
dc.sourceGland Surgery [ISSN 2227-684X], v. 9 (2), p. 209-218en_US
dc.subject3213 Cirugíaen_US
dc.subject.otherBreast reconstructionen_US
dc.subject.otherFailureen_US
dc.subject.otherImplanten_US
dc.subject.otherMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherRadiotheraphyen_US
dc.titleImplant-based immediate breast reconstruction: failure rate when radiating the tissue expander or the permanent implant-a meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21037/gs.2020.01.20en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85086128343-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000530133600007-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,643
dc.description.jcr2,953
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Bioquímica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Clínicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0096-7142-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0517-8209-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameMartín González, Juan Manuel-
crisitem.author.fullNameLoro Ferrer, Juan Francisco-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,08 MB)
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.