Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/112828
Title: Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: failure rate when radiating the tissue expander or the permanent implant-a meta-analysis
Authors: Fuertes, Victor
Frances, Mónica
Casarrubios, José M.
Fernández-Palacios, Javier
Martín González, Juan Manuel 
Loro Ferrer, Juan Francisco 
UNESCO Clasification: 3213 Cirugía
Keywords: Breast reconstruction
Failure
Implant
Meta-analysis
Radiotheraphy
Issue Date: 2020
Journal: Gland Surgery 
Abstract: Background: Implant-based immediate approach remains to be a first line option for reconstruction of mastectomy defects. When combined with post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) two different schemas are possible: radiating the temporary tissue expander (TTE) or the permanent implant (PI). The present article intends to be the biggest cohort meta-analysis to the date comparing reconstructive failure (RF) rate in these two scenarios: PMRT to TE compared with PMRT to PI. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed on PUBMED/MEDLINE. The following key words were chosen: Breast Reconstruction AND Implant based AND Immediate. The time limit applied was from January 2008 to January 2019. We selected ten articles (n=1,130) to perform a meta-analysis due to the similarity of their approaches. Secondly, we did a simple literature review in order to identify some variables possibly working as predicting factors for RF. Results: Previous meta-analysis are analysed. Some variables possibly working as risk factors for RF are summarized. We performed a meta-analysis in two scenarios: a fixed-effect model and a random effect model. For the random effect model an OR of 1.85 was obtained (0.96, 3.57; P=0.067). A funnel plot is performed showing no publication bias exists. Conclusions: There is a tendency towards a higher RF rate when the TTE is irradiated compared with the irradiation of the PI. Further studies trying to elucidate the influence of the suggested risk factors for RF have to be performed to stablish a consensus about the indications and contraindications of this reconstructive modality.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/112828
ISSN: 2227-684X
DOI: 10.21037/gs.2020.01.20
Source: Gland Surgery [ISSN 2227-684X], v. 9 (2), p. 209-218
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,08 MB)
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.