Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/112828
Título: Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: failure rate when radiating the tissue expander or the permanent implant-a meta-analysis
Autores/as: Fuertes, Victor
Frances, Mónica
Casarrubios, José M.
Fernández-Palacios, Javier
Martín González, Juan Manuel 
Loro Ferrer, Juan Francisco 
Clasificación UNESCO: 3213 Cirugía
Palabras clave: Breast reconstruction
Failure
Implant
Meta-analysis
Radiotheraphy
Fecha de publicación: 2020
Publicación seriada: Gland Surgery 
Resumen: Background: Implant-based immediate approach remains to be a first line option for reconstruction of mastectomy defects. When combined with post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) two different schemas are possible: radiating the temporary tissue expander (TTE) or the permanent implant (PI). The present article intends to be the biggest cohort meta-analysis to the date comparing reconstructive failure (RF) rate in these two scenarios: PMRT to TE compared with PMRT to PI. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed on PUBMED/MEDLINE. The following key words were chosen: Breast Reconstruction AND Implant based AND Immediate. The time limit applied was from January 2008 to January 2019. We selected ten articles (n=1,130) to perform a meta-analysis due to the similarity of their approaches. Secondly, we did a simple literature review in order to identify some variables possibly working as predicting factors for RF. Results: Previous meta-analysis are analysed. Some variables possibly working as risk factors for RF are summarized. We performed a meta-analysis in two scenarios: a fixed-effect model and a random effect model. For the random effect model an OR of 1.85 was obtained (0.96, 3.57; P=0.067). A funnel plot is performed showing no publication bias exists. Conclusions: There is a tendency towards a higher RF rate when the TTE is irradiated compared with the irradiation of the PI. Further studies trying to elucidate the influence of the suggested risk factors for RF have to be performed to stablish a consensus about the indications and contraindications of this reconstructive modality.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/112828
ISSN: 2227-684X
DOI: 10.21037/gs.2020.01.20
Fuente: Gland Surgery [ISSN 2227-684X], v. 9 (2), p. 209-218
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,08 MB)
Vista completa

Citas SCOPUSTM   

4
actualizado el 14-abr-2024

Visitas

54
actualizado el 30-mar-2024

Descargas

50
actualizado el 30-mar-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.