Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/112553
Title: | Pembrolizumab Plus Ipilimumab or Placebo for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score ≥ 50%: Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III KEYNOTE-598 Study | Authors: | Boyer, Michael Şendur, Mehmet A.N. Rodríguez Abreu, Delvys Park, Keunchil Lee, Dae Ho Çiçin, Irfan Yumuk, Perran Fulden Orlandi, Francisco J. Leal, Ticiana A. Molinier, Olivier Soparattanapaisarn, Nopadol Langleben, Adrian Califano, Raffaele Medgyasszay, Balazs Hsia, Te Chun Otterson, Gregory A. Xu, Lu Piperdi, Bilal Samkari, Ayman Reck, Martin |
UNESCO Clasification: | 32 Ciencias médicas 320713 Oncología |
Keywords: | Pembrolizumab Ipilimumab Placebo Lung cancer PD-L1, et al |
Issue Date: | 2021 | Journal: | Journal of Clinical Oncology | Abstract: | PURPOSE: Pembrolizumab monotherapy is standard first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50% without actionable driver mutations. It is not known whether adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab improves efficacy over pembrolizumab alone in this population. METHODS: In the randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-598 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03302234), eligible patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and no sensitizing EGFR or ALK aberrations were randomly allocated 1:1 to ipilimumab 1 mg/kg or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 18 doses; all participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 35 doses. Primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 568 participants, 284 were randomly allocated to each group. Median overall survival was 21.4 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 21.9 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.37; P = .74). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 8.4 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.30; P = .72). Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 62.4% of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab recipients versus 50.2% of pembrolizumab-placebo recipients and led to death in 13.1% versus 7.5%. The external data and safety monitoring committee recommended that the study be stopped for futility and that participants discontinue ipilimumab and placebo. CONCLUSION: Adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab does not improve efficacy and is associated with greater toxicity than pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and no targetable EGFR or ALK aberrations. These data do not support use of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab in place of pembrolizumab monotherapy in this population. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/112553 | ISSN: | 0732-183X | DOI: | 10.1200/JCO.20.03579 | Source: | Journal of Clinical Oncology [ISSN 0732-183X], v. 39(21), p. 2327-2338 (Enero 2021) |
Appears in Collections: | Artículos |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
170
checked on Nov 17, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
138
checked on Nov 17, 2024
Page view(s)
67
checked on May 25, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Share
Export metadata
Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.