Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/112127
Título: | Differences in Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Responses by Using Cochlear Implant and Otolith Organ Direct Stimulation | Autores/as: | Rodríguez Montesdeoca, Isaura Ramos De Miguel, Ángel Falcon Gonzalez, Juan Carlos Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia Perez Fernandez, Nicolas Vanspauwen, Robby Ramos Macías, Ángel Manuel |
Clasificación UNESCO: | 32 Ciencias médicas 241113 Fisiología de la audición |
Palabras clave: | Electrical stimulation Vestibular implant Balance Bilateral vestibulopathy Vestibulo-collic reflex, et al. |
Fecha de publicación: | 2021 | Proyectos: | European development of Bionics Vestibular implant for Bilateral Vestibular dysfunction | Publicación seriada: | Frontiers in Neurology | Resumen: | Objective: Several studies have demonstrated the possibility to obtain vestibular potentials elicited with electrical stimulation from cochlear and vestibular implants. The objective of this study is to analyze the vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) obtained from patients implanted with cochlear and vestibulo-cochlear implant. Material and Methods: We compared two groups: in the first group, four cochlear implant (CI) recipients with present acoustic cVEMPs before CI surgery were included. In the second group, three patients with bilaterally absent cVEMPs and bilateral vestibular dysfunction were selected. The latter group received a unilateral cochleo-vestibular implant. We analyze the electrically elicited cVEMPs in all patients after stimulation with cochlear and vestibular electrode array stimulation. Results: We present the results obtained post-operatively in both groups. All patients (100%) with direct electrical vestibular stimulation via the vestibular electrode array had present cVEMPs. The P1 and N1 latencies were 11.33–13.6 ms and 18.3–21 ms, respectively. In CI patients, electrical cVEMPs were present only in one of the four subjects (25%) with cochlear implant (“cross”) stimulation, and P1 and N1 latencies were 9.67 and 16.33, respectively. In these patients, the responses present shorter latencies than those observed acoustically. Conclusions: Electrically evoked cVEMPs can be present after cochlear and vestibular stimulation and suggest stimulation of vestibular elements, although clinical effect must be further studied. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/112127 | ISSN: | 1664-2295 | DOI: | 10.3389/fneur.2021.663803 | Fuente: | Frontiers in Neurology [ISSN 1664-2295], n. 25 |
Colección: | Artículos |
Citas SCOPUSTM
8
actualizado el 10-nov-2024
Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
7
actualizado el 10-nov-2024
Visitas
81
actualizado el 11-may-2024
Descargas
94
actualizado el 11-may-2024
Google ScholarTM
Verifica
Altmetric
Comparte
Exporta metadatos
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.