Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/111384
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Nava, Gontranden_US
dc.contributor.authorAsokkumar, Ravishankaren_US
dc.contributor.authorBautista Castaño, Inmaculadaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLaster, Janeseen_US
dc.contributor.authorNegi, Anuradhaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFook-Chong, Stephanieen_US
dc.contributor.authorNebreda Duran, Javieren_US
dc.contributor.authorEspinett Coll, Eduarden_US
dc.contributor.authorGebelli, Jordi Pujolen_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Ruiz De Gordejuela, Amadoren_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-06T08:26:51Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-06T08:26:51Z-
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-726Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/111384-
dc.description.abstractBackground Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an effective treatment option for obesity. However, data comparing its efficacy to bariatric surgery are scarce. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of ESG with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic greater curve plication (LGCP) at 2 years. Methods We reviewed 353 patient records and identified 296 patients who underwent ESG (n=199), LSG (n=61), and LGCP (n=36) at four centers in Spain between 2014 and 2016.We compared their total body weight loss (%TBWL) and safety over 2 years. A linear mixed model (LMM) was used to analyze repeated measures of weight loss outcomes at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months to compare the three procedures. Results Among the 296 patients, 210 (ESG 135, LSG 43, LGCP 32) completed 1 year of follow-up and 102 (ESG 46, LSG 34, LGCP 22) reached 2 years. Their mean (standard deviation [SD]) body mass index (BMI) was 39.6 (4.8) kg/m 2. There were no differences in age, sex, or BMI between the groups. In LMM analysis, adjusting for age, sex, and initial BMI, we found ESG had a significantly lower TBWL, %TBWL, and BMI decline compared with LSG and LGCP at all time points (P =0.001). The adjusted mean %TBWL at 2 years for ESG, LSG, and LGCP were 18.5%, 28.3%, and 26.9%, respectively. However, ESG, when compared with LSG and LGCP, had a shorter inpatient stay (1 vs. 3 vs. 3 days; P <0.001) and lower complication rate (0.5% vs. 4.9% vs. 8.3%; P =0.006). Conclusion All three procedures induced significant weight loss in obese patients. Although the weight loss was lower with ESG compared with other techniques, it displayed a better safety profile and shorter hospital stay.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEndoscopy (Stuttgart)en_US
dc.sourceEndoscopy (Stuttgart) [ISSN 0013-726X], v. 53(03), p. 235-243en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject320503 Gastroenterologíaen_US
dc.subject3213 Cirugíaen_US
dc.subject.otherGastroplastyen_US
dc.subject.otherLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyen_US
dc.subject.otherCurve plicationen_US
dc.titleEndoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and laparoscopic greater curve plication: Do they differ at 2 years?en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/a-1224-7231en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32698234-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85092724716-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.description.lastpage243en_US
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.description.firstpage235en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages9en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr1,468
dc.description.jcr9,776
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds11,0
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Nutrición-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Clínicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9257-8739-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameBautista Castaño, Inmaculada-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (699,14 kB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.