Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/111342
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarber, M. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMedina, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCabrera, F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRomero, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorValle Morales, Leonoren_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Hernández, J. A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T10:14:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-03T10:14:45Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn0144-3615en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/111342-
dc.description.abstractWe conducted a prospective observational study of 306 asymptomatic women at 2022 weeks of pregnancy to compare 3-dimensional ultrasound measurements of cervical volume with 2-dimensional ultrasound measurements of cervical length to evaluate the performance of cervical volume as a predictor of pre-term delivery, compared with the current standard, cervical length. Participants underwent transvaginal ultrasound measurements of cervical length (mm) and cervical volume (cm3). Cervical volume as measured by 3-dimensional ultrasound was found to be a useful tool for predicting pre-term delivery; however, due to the high correlation between cervical length and cervical volume and the lack of differences in the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and relative risk between the two methods, replacing cervical length measurements with cervical volume calculations does not seem to be justified for this purpose, because of increased difficulty in volume acquisition.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology [ISSN 0144-3615], v. 32 (7), p. 648-651en_US
dc.subject320108 Ginecologíaen_US
dc.subject.other3D-ultrasounden_US
dc.subject.otherCervical lengthen_US
dc.subject.otherCervical volumeen_US
dc.subject.otherPrematurityen_US
dc.subject.otherVOCALen_US
dc.titleCervical length vs VOCAL cervical volume for predicting pre-term delivery in asymptomatic women at 20-22 weeks' pregnancyen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/01443615.2012.698330en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22943710-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84866180854-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,354
dc.description.jcr0,546
dc.description.sjrqQ3
dc.description.jcrqQ4
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4483-3576-
crisitem.author.fullNameValle Morales, Leonor-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.