Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/134737
Título: Prostate cancer patients with lymphatic node involvement detected by immunohistochemistry. Is the effort worthwhile?
Autores/as: De Pablos Rodríguez, Pedro 
Claps, Francesco
Acin, Ana Aldaz
Gomez-Ferrer, Alvaro
Wong, Augusto
Catala, Juan Boronat
Fons, Ana Calatrava
Garcia, Antonio Coy
Borja, Juan Casanova-Ramon
Backhaus, Miguel Ramirez
Clasificación UNESCO: 32 Ciencias médicas
320713 Oncología
321316 Urología
Palabras clave: Radical Prostatectomy
Dissection
Metastases
Prostate Cancer
Lymph Node Assessment, et al.
Fecha de publicación: 2024
Publicación seriada: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 
Resumen: Introduction: Lymph node (LN) status is one of the main prognostic factors in localized prostate cancer (CaP) patients after surgery. Examining palpable lymph nodes with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) is the most common approach in clinical practice; however, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been reported to increase the LN detection rate. We reviewed the oncological results of patients with LN metastasis detected by IHC. Methods: Retrospective study of CaP patients who underwent lymphadenectomy at the time of the prostatectomy. Extended lymphadenectomy was performed with complementary indocyanine green (ICG) guidance. Three groups were considered according to LN status. Definition of the pN+ group was made if LNs were detected by HE, occulted lymph node-positive (OLN+) was considered when >= 1 LN was identified with IHC and occulted lymph node-negative (OLN-) if no metastatic nodes were found. Oncological outcomes were reported regarding PSA kinetics, biochemical recurrence (BCR), need for secondary treatments and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Results: A total of 283 patients with a median follow-up of 69 months were included in the study. Immunohistochemical assessment revealed metastatic LNs in 8.9% of patients. The rate of locally advanced disease and positive surgical margins was higher in the OLN + and pN + groups vs the OLN - group (P < 0.05). At the end of follow-up, 19%, 44% and 52% of patients from the OLN -, OLN + and pN+ groups experienced BCR (P < 0.001), respectively. Additionally, 2.6%, 17% and 22% of patients developed metastatic progression from the OLN -, OLN + and pN+ group (P < 0.001), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the OLN + group had a higher risk HR: 12 (95% CI, 2.4-56; P = 0.002) of metastatic progression in comparison with OLN - patients. This difference was not observed in the risk of Conclusion: Conventional HE histological analysis underdiagnosed nearly 10% of patients. IHC-detected patients were at higher risk of metastasis development than OLN - patients. This report highlights the importance of optimizing the anatomopathological analysis properly.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/134737
ISSN: 1078-1439
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.05.003
Fuente: Urologic Oncology-Seminars And Original Investigations[ISSN 1078-1439],v. 42 (9), p. 288e1-288e6, (Septiembre 2024)
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (917,1 kB)
Vista completa

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.