Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/101091
Título: | Control of water potability methods in farms in Gran Canaria | Autores/as: | Ramírez Vega, Héctor José | Director/a : | Ramírez Olivares, Natividad Del Carmen Millán Larriva, Rafael |
Clasificación UNESCO: | 250811 Calidad de las aguas 330811 Control de la contaminación del agua 330806 Regeneración del agua |
Palabras clave: | water disinfection chlorination hydrrogen peroxide biofilm cattle farm water, et al. |
Fecha de publicación: | 2019 | Resumen: | Water cattle farms do not have the relevance it should. Cattle drinking water must be at the same hygienic- sanitary level as the facilities where they are raised, the feed they consume or the genetics of our animals. Nowadays water is getting more and more important at those farms not just for its quality but also for its quality. A right water supply is an essential requirement when talking about these facilities. Currently, advances in food safety have shown it is important to control all different phases in the feed chain from production to consumption with the aim of guaranteeing the best final product. Unfortunately, water also contains physical, chemical and microbiological pollutants. As a result of this, it must be well disinfected and controlled efficiently and exhaustively from the entrance of water at the cattle farms to its consumption by animals for slaughter. By-products generated by the current disinfectants (DBP) are being studied in the last researches due to the fact that they generate a public health issue and they are linked to carcinogenic and mutagenic properties. It is important to bear in mind in which compounds, disinfectants used, are broken down and the consequences they produce. As a result of this research, trihalomethanes emerge linked to water chlorination. Cattle farms stats using disinfectants such as the hydrogen peroxide composed by natural by-products such as water and oxygen that can be found in the environment and are healthy for the living beings (Schmidt et al, 2006). As a drawback, it can be mentioned that the investment is higher as they are less profitable. | Departamento: | Departamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos | Facultad: | Facultad de Veterinaria | Titulación: | Grado en Veterinaria | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/101091 |
Colección: | Trabajo final de grado |
En el caso de que no encuentre el documento puede ser debido a que el centro o las/os autoras/es no autorizan su publicación. Si tiene verdadero interés en el contenido del mismo, puede dirigirse al director/a o directores/as del trabajo cuyos datos encontrará más arriba.
Vista completaLos elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.