Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/77992
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorMendoza Milara, Joseen_US
dc.contributor.authorLópez de Asiain Alberich, Maríaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGomez Azpeitia, Gabrielen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T10:13:40Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-09T10:13:40Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-938318403-3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/77992-
dc.description.abstractHow much does it cost to rehabilitate and extend, with optimal conditions of habitability, a nonused building versus starting a new one from scratch? One of the main challenges we are facing nowadays in order to fight against climate change is the efficient use of resources in all areas of society. From the scopes of architecture and building sciences, the efficiency in the management of resources will be key for improving our capacity of adaptation towards the requirements of sustainable development and climate change. This issue is directly linked to the topic of rehabilitation versus building from scratch (starting with a new floor plan). The research developed for the thesis "Life cycles of materials. Building from scratch versus rehabilitation and extension of the traditional dwelling from Extremadura" presents values that go far beyond the estimations made for the initial hypothesis; the impacts on the quality of the natural environment of a renewed-extended existing dwelling is 63,42% lower than the impacts generated by building a new one. Specifically in economical terms, the costs of a renewal/extension of an existing dwelling are 36,90% lower than the costs of a new building. Having these data values, a quite important question is still in the air: Which will be the steps required to be able to acknowledge society about this issue? We have completed an empirical demonstration in the case study of the dwelling in C/ Colón 36, in Castuera (Spain), where we present the process to obtain satisfactory results using the following methodology: DECONSTRUCTION + REUSE = NØWASTEen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherCEPT University Pressen_US
dc.source30th International PLEA Conference: Sustainable Habitat for Developing Societies: Choosing the Way Forward - Proceedings / Rawal, R.; Manu, S.; Khadpekar, N. (eds), v. 3, p. 366-373en_US
dc.subject330514 Viviendasen_US
dc.titleDeconstruction + Reuse = NØ Wasteen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceobjecten_US
dc.typeConferenceObjecten_US
dc.relation.conferenceXXX International on Passive and Low Energy Architecture Conferenceen_US
dc.description.lastpage373en_US
dc.description.firstpage366en_US
dc.investigacionIngeniería y Arquitecturaen_US
dc.type2Actas de congresosen_US
dc.description.numberofpages8en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcNoen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-ARQen_US
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate16-12-2014-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate18-12-2014-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Arte, Ciudad y Territorio-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9422-394X-
crisitem.author.fullNameLópez De Asiain Alberich, María-
Colección:Actas de congresos
Vista resumida

Visitas

48
actualizado el 30-dic-2023

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.