Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/77402
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Rosell, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorYáñez-García, Juan Manuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMora-Custodio, Ricardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorPareja-Blanco, Fernandoen_US
dc.contributor.authorRavelo García, Antonio Gabrielen_US
dc.contributor.authorRibas-Serna, Juanen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Badillo, Juan Joséen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T08:53:57Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-01T08:53:57Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn1715-5312en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/77402-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the effects of 2 resistance training (RT) programs with different velocity losses (VLs) allowed in each set: 10% (VL10%) versus 30% (VL30%) on neuromuscular performance and hormonal response. Twenty-five young healthy males were randomly assigned into 2 groups: VL10% (n = 12) or VL30% (n = 13). Subjects followed a velocity-based RT program for 8 weeks (2 sessions per week) using only the full-squat (SQ) exercise at 70%–85% 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Repetition velocity was recorded in all training sessions. A 20-m running sprint, countermovement jump (CMJ), 1RM, muscle endurance, and electromyogram (EMG) during SQ exercise and resting hormonal concentrations were assessed before and after the RT program. Both groups showed similar improvements in muscle strength and endurance variables (VL10%: 7.0%–74.8%; VL30%: 4.2%–73.2%). The VL10% resulted in greater percentage increments in CMJ (9.2% vs. 5.4%) and sprint performance (–1.5% vs. 0.4%) than VL30%, despite VL10% performing less than half of the repetitions than VL30% during RT. In addition, only VL10% showed slight increments in EMG variables, whereas no significant changes in resting hormonal concentrations were observed. Therefore, our results suggest that velocity losses in the set as low as 10% are enough to achieve significant improvements in neuromuscular performance, which means greater efficiency during RT.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolismen_US
dc.sourceApplied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism [ISSN 1715-5312], v. 45(8), p. 817 - 828en_US
dc.subject3307 Tecnología electrónicaen_US
dc.subject.otherMuscle adaptationsen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysical performanceen_US
dc.subject.otherResistance trainingen_US
dc.subject.otherFull squaten_US
dc.subject.otherEMGen_US
dc.subject.otherEndocrine responseen_US
dc.titleVelocity-based resistance training: impact of velocity loss in the set on neuromuscular performance and hormonal responseen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1139/apnm-2019-0829en_US
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,789
dc.description.jcr2,665
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ3
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IDeTIC: División de Procesado Digital de Señales-
crisitem.author.deptIU para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Señales y Comunicaciones-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8512-965X-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación-
crisitem.author.fullNameRavelo García, Antonio Gabriel-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Thumbnail
Adobe PDF (624,61 kB)
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.