Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/76787
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJames, Chris J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFraysse, Bernarden_US
dc.contributor.authorDeguine, Olivieren_US
dc.contributor.authorLenarz, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorMawman, Deborahen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamos Macías, Ángelen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamsden, Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorSterkers, Olivieren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-18T08:19:07Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-18T08:19:07Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-8055-8212-4en_US
dc.identifier.issn1420-3030en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/76787-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To report on combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic stimulation in a subset of conventional candidates for cochlear implantation where preoperative pure tone thresholds were ≤60 dB HL for 250 and 500 Hz. Methods: Subjects were 10 adults implanted with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance perimodiolar electrode array. Soft surgical procedures were strictly observed: ≤1.5-mm cochleostomy hole placed anterior and inferior to the round window, a Healon bubble placed over the opening to prevent entry of foreign bodies, and no suction applied. The electrode array was inserted 17 mm to the first marker rib using the recommended 'advance-off-stylet' technique. Pure tone hearing threshold levels were recorded pre-, and postoperatively at 1-2 and 6-12 months. Speech recognition was tested for cochlear implant (CI) alone and combined with ipsilateral hearing aid for 7 subjects who retained significant residual hearing in the implanted ear at 1-2 months after operation. Results: There were 3/10 cases where 1-2 months after operation low-frequency responses were considered vibrotactile only (>85-110 dB HL, 250-500 Hz). In the remaining 7 cases, residual hearing was maintained up to at least 6 months after operation with minor changes. Insertion depth angles in these cases ranged from 285 to 420°. For these subjects, the mean preoperative score for words presented at 65 dB SPL was 22%. Mean postoperative scores were 56% for CI alone, and 68% for CI plus ipsilateral hearing aid (p < 0.05, paired t). For sentences presented in multitalker babble noise at 5 dB SNR, mean scores were 61% CI alone, and 75% CI+IpsiHA (p < 0.01, paired t). Conclusions: Hearing was conserved during surgery and over time in 70% of conventional candidates implanted with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance CI who had significant levels of preoperative low-frequency residual hearing (≤60 dB HL). These conventional candidates for CI also benefited from improved speech recognition in noise when using combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic stimulation.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAudiology and Neuro-Otologyen_US
dc.sourceAudiology and Neurotology [ISSN 1420-3030], v. 11 (SUPPL. 1), p. 57-62, (Octubre 2006)en_US
dc.subject321305 Cirugía de garganta, nariz y oídosen_US
dc.subject.otherCochlear implanten_US
dc.subject.otherResidual hearingen_US
dc.subject.otherSpeech recognitioni in noiseen_US
dc.titleCombined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantationen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecten_US
dc.typeConferenceObjecten_US
dc.relation.conference1st International Electro-Acoustic Workshop. Cochlear implantationen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000095615en_US
dc.identifier.scopus33750286196-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7203017474-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7007176703-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003638549-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35227565300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603243491-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid15045634000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005892852-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005874307-
dc.identifier.eissn1421-9700-
dc.description.lastpage62en_US
dc.identifier.issueSUPPL. 1-
dc.description.firstpage57en_US
dc.relation.volume11en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Actas de congresosen_US
dc.description.notasEditor(s): Fraysse, B.en_US
dc.identifier.eisbn978-3-318-01425-9-
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateOctubre 2006en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.description.jcr1,758
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR SIANI: Ingeniería biomédica aplicada a estimulación neural y sensorial-
crisitem.author.deptIU Sistemas Inteligentes y Aplicaciones Numéricas-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4709-5559-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU Sistemas Inteligentes y Aplicaciones Numéricas-
crisitem.author.fullNameRamos Macías, Ángel Manuel-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate08-12-2005-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate10-12-2005-
Appears in Collections:Actas de congresos
Thumbnail
pdf
Adobe PDF (283,8 kB)
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.