Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/76723
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuárez de Lezo, Joséen_US
dc.contributor.authorPavlovic, Djordjeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMedina, Alfonsoen_US
dc.contributor.authorPan, Manuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorCabrera, José Angelen_US
dc.contributor.authorRomero Moreno, Miguel Ángelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSegura, Joséen_US
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Enriqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorGallardo, Arsenioen_US
dc.contributor.authorMelián, Franciscoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-16T09:32:56Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-16T09:32:56Z-
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-8703en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/76723-
dc.description.abstractThis study was undertaken to characterize, by intracoronary ultrasound technique, the neointimal thickening at follow-up of treated coronary segments after successful arterial wall repair and to compare the findings with serial angiographic studies. We selected for study 81 patients with single-vessel coronary disease successfully treated by percutaneous revascularization who were angiographically and ultrasonically reevaluated at a mean follow-up time of 22 +/- 21 months; 23 had been treated by balloon angioplasty, 27 by directional atherectomy, and 31 by elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation. The late maximal neointimal thickness varied between 0.1 and 1.5 mm (mean 0.65 +/- 0.31 mm), and the neointimal area ranged between 0.97 and 14.9 mm(2) (mean 5.19 +/- 3.14 mm(2)). The neointimal repair was thinner in patients who obtained a better acute angiographic result immediately after treatment and in stented (3.4 +/- 1.8 mm(2)) versus dilated (7.8 +/- 4.1 mm(2)) or resected (5 +/- 1.6 mm(2), p < 0.001) segments. On the contrary, the repaired neointimal layer was thicker in those patients who angiographically exhibited less late luminal loss or even expansion and in those evaluated after a longer time since treatment. The acute gain and the time influence resulted in independent predictors of the degree of neointimal thickness. These findings suggest that two reparative mechanisms of the coronary wall may operate in close relation.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe American heart journalen_US
dc.sourceThe American heart journal [ISSN 0002-8703], v. 133 (2), p. 210-220, (Febrero 1997)en_US
dc.subject320501 Cardiologíaen_US
dc.titleAngiographic predictors of neointimal thickening after successful coronary wall healing following percutaneous revascularizationen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0002-8703(97)70211-4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid9023168-
dc.identifier.isiA1997WK04600011-
dc.description.lastpage220en_US
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.description.firstpage210en_US
dc.relation.volume133en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid67522-
dc.contributor.daisngid831427-
dc.contributor.daisngid74576-
dc.contributor.daisngid77557-
dc.contributor.daisngid120551-
dc.contributor.daisngid156230-
dc.contributor.daisngid1825688-
dc.contributor.daisngid739297-
dc.contributor.daisngid2961613-
dc.contributor.daisngid4882689-
dc.description.numberofpages11en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:deLezo, JS-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Pavlovic, D-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Medina, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Pan, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cabrera, JA-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Romero, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Segura, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Hernandez, E-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gallardo, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Melian, F-
dc.date.coverdateFebrero 1997en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.description.jcr1,993
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.fullNameGómez De Tejada Romero, Mª Jesús-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Sep 29, 2024

Page view(s)

54
checked on May 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.