Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/76237
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVaamonde, Diana M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCastillo, Eduardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorPoblador, Maria S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Manso, Juan M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLancho, Jose L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-02T13:56:01Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-02T13:56:01Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/76237-
dc.description.abstractDa Silva-Grigoletto, ME, Vaamonde, DM, Castillo, E, Poblador, MS, Garcia-Manso, JM, and Lancho, JL. Acute and cumulative effects of different times of recovery from whole body vibration exposure on muscle performance. J Strength Cond Res 23(7): 2073-2082, 2009-This experiment was designed to assess the acute (Study I) and cumulative response (Study II) of muscle performance to differing recovery times after exposure to whole body vibration (WBV). All subjects (mean age 19.7 +/- 1.9) were healthy and physically active. In both studies, subjects were exposed to a WBV bout of 6 exposures of 60 seconds each, with frequency of 30 Hz and amplitude of 4 mm. In Study I, subjects (n = 30) underwent 3 trials (1 per day) on different days with a 2-day wash-out period between trials; each trial included either a 1, 2, or 3 minutes of recovery between exposures to WBV. All subjects underwent all trials, which were randomly assigned. Jump ability and muscle power were measured before and after each bout. In Study II, subjects (n = 45) underwent 12 sessions of WBV training in 4 weeks (3 bouts/ wk). The subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 3 groups: WBV with 1-minute recovery periods between exposures, WBV with 2-minute recovery periods between exposures, or control group. Jump ability, muscle power, and strength were measured before and after each bout. In the acute study (I), recovery times of 1 and 2 minutes enhanced all measured parameters (p < 0.05), with the 2-minute recovery being more effective. In the long-term study (II), however, although both periods also enhanced the measured parameters (p < 0.05), the 1-minute recovery proved more effective because the response was modified by systematic stimulation. In conclusion, 2-minute recovery periods provided the most effective acute enhancement of muscle activation, whereas the 1-minute recovery provided a more effective cumulative enhancement of muscle power and jump ability.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Strength and Conditioning Researchen_US
dc.sourceJournal Of Strength And Conditioning Research[ISSN 1064-8011],v. 23 (7), p. 2073-2082, (Octubre 2009)en_US
dc.subject241110 Fisiología del músculoen_US
dc.subject.otherRest Interval Lengthen_US
dc.subject.otherShort-Term Recoveryen_US
dc.subject.otherSkeletal-Muscleen_US
dc.subject.otherPostactivation Potentiationen_US
dc.subject.otherDifferent Frequenciesen_US
dc.subject.otherMuscular Performanceen_US
dc.subject.otherStrengthen_US
dc.subject.otherExerciseen_US
dc.subject.otherStimulationen_US
dc.subject.otherPoweren_US
dc.subject.otherTrainingen_US
dc.subject.otherMuscular Strengthen_US
dc.subject.otherMuscular Poweren_US
dc.titleAcute And Cumulative Effects Of Different Times Of Recovery From Whole Body Vibration Exposure On Muscle Performanceen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b865d2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus70449440292-
dc.identifier.isi000271569300023-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid23481201700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid14523595900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24764797200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506217589-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6508074186-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603258324-
dc.identifier.eissn1533-4287-
dc.description.lastpage2082en_US
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.description.firstpage2073en_US
dc.relation.volume23en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid1417974-
dc.contributor.daisngid2028105-
dc.contributor.daisngid6404688-
dc.contributor.daisngid3398909-
dc.contributor.daisngid1345341-
dc.contributor.daisngid3481542-
dc.description.numberofpages10en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Da Silva-Grigoletto, ME-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Vaamonde, DM-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Castillo, E-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Poblador, MS-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Garcia-Manso, JM-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Lancho, JL-
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2009en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-FISen_US
dc.description.jcr1,457
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
Colección:Artículos
miniatura
PDF
Adobe PDF (560,1 kB)
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

23
actualizado el 21-abr-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

21
actualizado el 25-feb-2024

Visitas

60
actualizado el 30-dic-2023

Descargas

200
actualizado el 30-dic-2023

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.