Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/73888
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Kerry A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWit, Liesbeth deen_US
dc.contributor.authorTimotijevic, Ladaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSonne, Anne-Metteen_US
dc.contributor.authorLähteenmäki, Liisaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrito Garcia, Noéen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeruszka-Bielak, Martaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSicinska, Ewaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Alana N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, Marken_US
dc.contributor.authorRaats, Monique M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-31T09:40:13Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-31T09:40:13Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.issn1368-9800en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/73888-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Transparent evidence-based decision making has been promoted worldwide to engender trust in science and policy making. Yet, little attention has been given to transparency implementation. The degree of transparency (focused on how uncertain evidence was handled) during the development of folate and vitamin D Dietary Reference Values was explored in three a priori defined areas: (i) value request; (ii) evidence evaluation; and (iii) final values.Design: Qualitative case studies (semi-structured interviews and desk research). A common protocol was used for data collection, interview thematic analysis and reporting. Results were coordinated via cross-case synthesis.Setting: Australia and New Zealand, Netherlands, Nordic countries, Poland, Spain and UK.Subjects: Twenty-one interviews were conducted in six case studies.Results: Transparency of process was not universally observed across countries or areas of the recommendation setting process. Transparency practices were most commonly seen surrounding the request to develop reference values (e.g. access to risk manager/assessor problem formulation discussions) and evidence evaluation (e.g. disclosure of risk assessor data sourcing/evaluation protocols). Fewer transparency practices were observed to assist with handling uncertainty in the evidence base during the development of quantitative reference values.Conclusions: Implementation of transparency policies may be limited by a lack of dedicated resources and best practice procedures, particularly to assist with the latter stages of reference value development. Challenges remain regarding the best practice for transparently communicating the influence of uncertain evidence on the final reference values. Resolving this issue may assist the evolution of nutrition risk assessment and better inform the recommendation setting process.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Health Nutritionen_US
dc.sourcePublic Health Nutrition [ISSN 1368-9800], v. 18 (supl. 8), p. 1378-1388, (Junio 2015)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject.otherEurrecaen_US
dc.subject.otherTransparencyen_US
dc.subject.otherUncertaintyen_US
dc.subject.otherMicronutrient Dietary Reference Valuesen_US
dc.subject.otherAdvisory Committeeen_US
dc.titleCommunication of scientific uncertainty: international case studies on the development of folate and vitamin D Dietary Reference Valuesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1368980014002006en_US
dc.identifier.scopus84928552333-
dc.identifier.isi000353518800006-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56713516700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24079598100-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid13907634600-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid8427055000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004347122-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55389671200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid37053906800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56607087900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56403843800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57202034119-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602419150-
dc.identifier.eissn1475-2727-
dc.description.lastpage1388en_US
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.description.firstpage1378en_US
dc.relation.volume18en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid1122313-
dc.contributor.daisngid3029097-
dc.contributor.daisngid1174919-
dc.contributor.daisngid2729141-
dc.contributor.daisngid346670-
dc.contributor.daisngid5287557-
dc.contributor.daisngid4356976-
dc.contributor.daisngid725262-
dc.contributor.daisngid17005899-
dc.contributor.daisngid8322193-
dc.contributor.daisngid156191-
dc.description.numberofpages11en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Brown, KA-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:de Wit, L-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Timotijevic, L-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Sonne, AM-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Lahteenmaki, L-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Garcia, NB-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Jeruszka-Bielak, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Sicinska, E-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Moore, AN-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Lawrence, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Raats, MM-
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2015en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,973
dc.description.jcr2,433
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Thumbnail
pdf
Adobe PDF (207,67 kB)
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Oct 13, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Oct 13, 2024

Page view(s)

84
checked on Sep 21, 2024

Download(s)

81
checked on Sep 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.