Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/73649
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorRuiz García, Alejandroen_US
dc.contributor.authorNuez Pestana, Ignacio de laen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarrascosa Chisvert, M.D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSantana Rodríguez, Juan Joséen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-10T07:42:03Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-10T07:42:03Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn0011-9164en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/73649-
dc.description.abstractReverse osmosis (RO) is the leading technology for desalinating seawater and brackish water (BW). In general, the desalination efficiency of BW is higher than that of seawater due to its lower total dissolved solids content. In addition to membrane fouling, fluctuations in the feedwater source are one of the main problems that affect desalination systems. These variations can have a significant impact on the operating parameters and efficiency of BWRO systems. In this work, hydrochemical fluctuations in well groundwater were used to evaluate the different operation windows of two BWRO system configurations, as well as their optimal operating points in terms of minimum specific energy consumption (SEC) and maximum flow recovery (R). Both configurations comprised two stages and 6 BWRO spiral wound membrane elements per pressure vessel (PV). One configuration had 2 and 1 PVs in the first and second stages respectively, and the other 3 and 2 PVs. Both systems were simulated using a range of feed flow and feed pressure values in addition to the inorganic compositions of 24 feedwater samples taken over a 10-year period. The results showed wider operation windows for the 3:2 than the 2:1 configuration. A common operation window (able to operate with all 24 feedwater samples) with wide operating margins was obtained for each configuration. For the 2:1 configuration, the 24-sample average SEC, average maximum SEC and average minimum SEC of this common operation window were 0.760, 1.198 and 0.339 kWh m−3, respectively, while the corresponding R values were 33.47, 67.66 and 19.86%.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDesalination (Amsterdam)en_US
dc.sourceDesalination (Amsterdam) [ISSN 0011-9164], v. 491, 114582, (Octubre 2020)en_US
dc.subject330806 Regeneración del aguaen_US
dc.subject3313 Tecnología e ingeniería mecánicasen_US
dc.subject.otherDesalinationen_US
dc.subject.otherBrackish wateren_US
dc.subject.otherOptimal operationen_US
dc.subject.otherReverse osmosisen_US
dc.subject.otherOperation windowen_US
dc.titleSimulations of BWRO systems under different feedwater characteristics. Analysis of operation windows and optimal operating pointsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.desal.2020.114582en_US
dc.identifier.isi000554911700035-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4464-
dc.description.lastpage114582 (9)en_US
dc.description.firstpage114582 (1 - 9)en_US
dc.relation.volume491en_US
dc.investigacionIngeniería y Arquitecturaen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid2368242-
dc.contributor.daisngid4413114-
dc.contributor.daisngid41145960-
dc.contributor.daisngid35250546-
dc.description.numberofpages9en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Ruiz-Garcia, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Nuez, I-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Carrascosa-Chisvert, D-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Santana, JJ-
dc.date.coverdateOctubre 2020en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-INGen_US
dc.description.sjr1,794
dc.description.jcr9,501
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Sistemas industriales de eficiciencia, instrumentación y protección-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ingeniería Electrónica y Automática-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Sistemas industriales de eficiciencia, instrumentación y protección-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ingeniería Electrónica y Automática-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Sistemas industriales de eficiciencia, instrumentación y protección-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ingeniería de Procesos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5209-653X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6652-2360-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3030-2195-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Ingeniería Electrónica y Automática-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Ingeniería Electrónica y Automática-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Ingeniería Electrónica y Automática-
crisitem.author.fullNameRuiz García, Alejandro-
crisitem.author.fullNameDe La Nuez Pestana, Ignacio Agustín-
crisitem.author.fullNameSantana Rodríguez, Juan José-
Colección:Artículos
JCR: Q1 – SJR: Q1
Unknown (1,39 MB)
Vista resumida

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

40
actualizado el 25-feb-2024

Visitas

166
actualizado el 27-ene-2024

Descargas

286
actualizado el 27-ene-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.