Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/72155
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGonzales Mantilla, Pedro Gonzaloen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeón González, Carmelo Javieren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T09:20:26Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-07T09:20:26Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn1867-2477en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/72155-
dc.description.abstractThere are many areas of high geological relevance in South America receiving visitors every year. However, most of these sites have not exploited their geotourism potential yet. This paper shows a comparison of the tourism management models of two geosites: Marcahuasi Stone Forest (MSF), in Peru, and Vila Velha State Park (VVSP), in Brazil. The aim of this work is to find out if the models applied in each area foster the socioeconomic development of the local population and conservation of geological heritage. Management structure, public actions, and the relationships between the stakeholders were observed and analyzed utilizing mixed data collection techniques and comparative analysis, finding out positive and negative aspects. Results show that MSF is managed exclusively by the local community and has not properly developed tourism because of a lack of planning and professional training. In VVSP, despite having a management plan and professionally prepared team, there is still a decoupling between the goal of conservation and social responsibility. In general, geoconservation is found not to be driving both forms of tourism management, and there is a lack of contribution to local socioeconomic development, mainly due to political reasons.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGeoheritageen_US
dc.sourceGeoheritage[ISSN 1867-2477],v. 12 (37), (Junio 2020)en_US
dc.subject531290 Economía sectorial: turismoen_US
dc.subject.otherGeoconservationen_US
dc.subject.otherGeotourismen_US
dc.subject.otherMarcahuasi Stone Foresten_US
dc.subject.otherTourism Managementen_US
dc.subject.otherVila Velha State Parken_US
dc.subject.otherTurismoen_US
dc.titleTourism management in South American geological areas: comparing two cases from Peru and Brazilen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12371-020-00455-6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85083492275-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57216433573-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7101886256-
dc.identifier.eissn1867-2485-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.relation.volume12en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateJunio 2020en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-ECOen_US
dc.description.sjr0,546
dc.description.jcr2,68
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ3
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptGIR TIDES: Economía, medioambiente, sostenibilidad y turismo-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0880-6020-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9451-4093-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.fullNameGonzales Mantilla, Pedro-
crisitem.author.fullNameLeón González, Carmelo Javier-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Jan 22, 2023

Page view(s)

108
checked on Oct 22, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.