Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/70878
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFerrando, Carlosen_US
dc.contributor.authorSoro, Marinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorUnzueta, Carmenen_US
dc.contributor.authorCanet, Jaumeen_US
dc.contributor.authorTusman, Gerardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuarez-Sipmann, Fernandoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLibrero, Julianen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeiró, Salvadoren_US
dc.contributor.authorPozo, Natividaden_US
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, Carlosen_US
dc.contributor.authorIbáñez, Maiteen_US
dc.contributor.authorAldecoa, Césaren_US
dc.contributor.authorGarutti, Ignacioen_US
dc.contributor.authorPestaña, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Pérez, Aurelio Eduardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Del Valle, Santiagoen_US
dc.contributor.authorDiaz-Cambronero, Oscaren_US
dc.contributor.authorBalust, Jaumeen_US
dc.contributor.authorRedondo, Francisco Javieren_US
dc.contributor.authorDe La Matta, Manuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorGallego, Lucíaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGranell, Manuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartínez, Pascualen_US
dc.contributor.authorPerez, Anaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeal, Sonsolesen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlday, Kikeen_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.authorMonedero, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Rafaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMazzinari, Guidoen_US
dc.contributor.authorAguilar, Gerardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorVillar, Jesúsen_US
dc.contributor.authorBelda, Francisco Javieren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-13T12:00:06Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-13T12:00:06Z-
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/70878-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Surgical site infection (SSI) is a serious postoperative complication that increases morbidity and healthcare costs. SSIs tend to increase as the partial pressure of tissue oxygen decreases: previous trials have focused on trying to reduce them by comparing high versus conventional inspiratory oxygen fractions (FIO 2) in the perioperative period but did not use a protocolised ventilatory strategy. The open-lung ventilatory approach restores functional lung volume and improves gas exchange, and therefore it may increase the partial pressure of tissue oxygen for a given FIO 2. The trial presented here aims to compare the efficacy of high versus conventional FIO 2 in reducing the overall incidence of SSIs in patients by implementing a protocolised and individualised global approach to perioperative open-lung ventilation. Methods and analysis This is a comparative, prospective, multicentre, randomised and controlled two-Arm trial that will include 756 patients scheduled for abdominal surgery. The patients will be randomised into two groups: (1) a high FIO 2 group (80% oxygen; FIO 2 of 0.80) and (2) a conventional FIO 2 group (30% oxygen; FIO 2 of 0.30). Each group will be assessed intra-and postoperatively. The primary outcome is the appearance of postoperative SSI complications. Secondary outcomes are the appearance of systemic and pulmonary complications. Ethics and dissemination The iPROVE-O2 trial has been approved by the Ethics Review Board at the reference centre (the Hospital Clínico Universitario in Valencia). Informed consent will be obtained from all patients before their participation. If the approach using high FIO 2 during individualised open-lung ventilation decreases SSIs, use of this method will become standard practice for patients scheduled for future abdominal surgery. Publication of the results is anticipated in early 2019. Trial registration number NCT02776046; Pre-results.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Openen_US
dc.sourceBMJ Open [ISSN 2044-6055], v. 7 (7), e016765en_US
dc.subject3207 Patologíaen_US
dc.titleRationale and study design for an individualised perioperative open-lung ventilatory strategy with a high versus conventional inspiratory oxygen fraction (iPROVE-O2) and its effects on surgical site infection: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trialen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016765en_US
dc.identifier.pmid7-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85026743685-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.description.firstpagee016765en_US
dc.relation.volume7en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
local.message.claim2020-09-17T12:56:30.068+0100|||rp01018|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None*
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr1,372
dc.description.jcr2,413
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0947-263X-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameRodríguez Pérez, Aurelio Eduardo-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Thumbnail
Adobe PDF (861,74 kB)
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Nov 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on Nov 17, 2024

Page view(s)

93
checked on May 4, 2024

Download(s)

119
checked on May 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.